DEFINITIONS may change, and statistics used to argue whether poverty is increasing or decreasing, but it makes little difference to those who experience hardship on a daily basis.
The claims by Professor John McKendrick that poverty affects one in three children in Glasgow is one which should make those in authority sit up and take notice.
Many initiatives are ongoing to alleviate child poverty and every level of government claims it is a priority and is keen to show it is taking action.
There are many reasons for poverty, including education, poor health and unemployment, and they are all linked, producing a cycle of deprivation which many families and communities find hard to break.
Cuts to council services and the welfare changes will do nothing to help combat poverty and for many will have the opposite effect and make a bad situation worse.
The professor's suggestion that child poverty should be considered when decisions to cut budgets are being taken is something which should be happening now.
To make it a legal requirement might give the problem a sharper focus at a community level where the impact is felt.
Poverty is an issue that demands more attention not less in times of economic difficulty.
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article