THE group representing Europe's leagues today insisted it is well placed to prevent the biggest clubs on the continent pulling further away from their counterparts in smaller footballing nations - including Celtic.

The European Leagues, which has changed its name from the European Professional Football Leagues, opposed upcoming changes to UEFA club competitions.

The top four leagues will automatically assume half of the 32 places in the Champions League group stages and the champions' route has been narrowed for smaller leagues.

Analysis presented at the European Leagues' general assembly suggests the 2018-2021 format will increase the financial advantage of the larger clubs while new co-efficient rules also favour them.

But with new representation on UEFA's executive committee along with seven other committees, the European Leagues feels it can ensure a fairer distribution of income.

Speaking at the meeting in Edinburgh, president Lars Christer Olsson said: "We believe that all our clubs, not just a few, should have the possibility to compete at the highest level.

“It is our firm view that as more and more money gets given to a small number of elite clubs, competitive balance is under threat like never before.

"It is not good for our leagues, it is not good for the vast majority of clubs and it is most certainly not good for fans."

The organisation has called for more equality between Champions League and Europa League payments as well as changes to the access list for countries when plans are drawn up for the 2021-24 cycle.

"We are very firm that some of the decisions need to be revised for the 21-24 cycle," Olsson said.

"The way the European club competitions are organised now, means it has a negative effect on our domestic competitions.

"It is not only difficult for clubs from smaller countries to come into the Champions League, it also has an effect on the major leagues. It is distorting the competitive balance of major leagues.

"We are convinced we will now be part of the decision-making procedure, so we will be able to influence the future of club competitions in a better way than we did before.

"We are now represented on the executive committee. And we agreed with all stakeholders, including the clubs, players, us and UEFA, that all matters which have an effect on the stakeholders should be passed by the Professional Football Strategy Council before it's presented to the executive committee for decisions. This is a major step forward.

"This means we can have a proper consultation process before decisions are made, which was not the case in the past."

Meanwhile, Olsson has told FIFA that proposals for an expanded 24-team Club World Cup, mooted to be held the year before every World Cup to replace the Confederations Cup, are a non-starter.

"We are totally against any Club World Cup as it has been presented so far," he said. "We are especially against the lack of consultation."