![]() |
Posted by: John Ferguson on 12:46pm Fri 25 May 07 Posted by: Tony, Glasgow on 12:54pm Fri 25 May 07 This is ridiculous. So the kids can watch unabated violence, but god forbid they should see someone smoke. This man should stop meddling and headline grabbing - his much vaunted smoking ban has seen sales of cigarettes increase. Hardly a great success story. Posted by: Chris on 1:17pm Fri 25 May 07 I understand that about a quarter of the population smoke but smoking is already under-represented in film and television. I'm sure this joined-up-thinking MSP was quite happy to push smokers out of recreational venues and onto the streets in full view of children. Is the banter and camaraderie of ordinary folk enjoying themselves ok because it isn't "glamorous, sexy or cool"? Posted by: Donnie, UK on 1:44pm Fri 25 May 07 Oh right, so kids can see any amount of violence, sex and corruption on the TV but carnt be allowed to watch someone using a legal product. This man should get real there are 100% more things to worry about with kids than cigarettes - heroin just one. Stupid Man Posted by: Fiona Burchill on 1:48pm Fri 25 May 07 Does the thinking behind this idea stem from the notion that children will blindly emulate everything they see on screen? If this is the case then all depictions of eating must also be banned lest children grow obese, all depictions of drinking alcohol must be banned in case they grow up into drunks. All depictions of romance must be banned to avert teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. All depictions of characters who are not carbon neutral must be banned. Children aren't daft Mr Gibson, and neither are we. Get lost. Posted by: Bill C, UK on 2:25pm Fri 25 May 07 Words actually fail me for the sheer and utter stupidity of Mr Gibson's remarks for all the reasons stipulated by other comments already made. Mr Gibson obviously has an obsession with people enjoying a legal product. Get a life Mr Gibson and actually do something useful for the people who elected you, or do us all a favour and resign. Posted by: Belinda, Edinburgh on 2:46pm Fri 25 May 07 Maybe we should have let Labour have their recount after all (just kidding). This really speaks volumes about a Scottish Executive that seems to think smoking is the worst experience thing that has ever befallen most of its electorate. Posted by: bill, glasgow on 5:01pm Fri 25 May 07 Posted by: Rab Jones, Glasgow on 5:24pm Fri 25 May 07 On the front cover of the Beatles "Abbey Road" Paul Mcartney is holding a cigarette. Does this mean, you will have to be 18 to purchase this CD in future. THis whole PC, nanny culture is getting on peoples nerves, and these left wing, lentil burger eating, losers are driving people round the bend. Posted by: Jay, Glasgow on 7:08pm Fri 25 May 07 Posted by: Hugh O`Brien, High Possil on 7:18pm Fri 25 May 07 Posted by: tam -m, southside on 7:20pm Fri 25 May 07 is this what our taxes are used for.this guy wont be happy until smokers are shot on sight.ive never heard so much crap in my life. Posted by: bill, glasgow on 8:08pm Fri 25 May 07 Posted by: Grandpaw Broon, Glasgow on 10:13pm Fri 25 May 07 This is good news banning under 18's from seeing films where people commit the serious legal act of smoking. I would assume also that this must also include television. So if legal acts are banned on tv, by default then all illegal acts must be banned also. Therefore no longer will we be subjected to all the illegal things we currently watch e.g there will be no more programmes where drug addicts are shown to be injecting; there will be no more acts of violence in any police or hospital drama.As swearing in public is deemed to be breeching the peace, no longer will will hear any 4 letter words either. One more point...since Iraq was an illegal war, we won't be getting any footage about that war either!!! Posted by: Mr Ave Empyshima, Glasgow on 11:56pm Fri 25 May 07 I think you are all missing the point. Generally speaking in movies, the stars who are seen to be smoking are the rebelious, hard, strong, cool, suave, sexy characters. When was the last time in a movie the only person you saw smoking was the fat speccy ginger bloke that coughed his guts up every time he had to jog for a pack of fags. Come on get a grip of yourselves. Anything that protects a youngsters thought process has to be welcomed. Lets put the shoe on the gangrenous other foot. How about a film where the lead character fails to escape from his enemy due to being breathless and we see him/her act out the rest of the film strapped to an oxygen cylinder? Posted by: Billy Bremner, Elland Road on 12:35am Sat 26 May 07 Mr emphysema, I sincerely hope this not your condition, if it is, you have my sympathy. My Father had it and it's not nice. However,not everyone who smokes gets such a condition, nor does everyone who abstains avoid it. My name and location are ironically chosen, since my famous namesake was a fantastic footballer who was also a chainsmoker. Many things are bad for us, and if we prevent young people from seeing all such things we will raise a generation on "The Sound Of Music"... AARGH! Posted by: Chris on 8:01am Sat 26 May 07 Rab Jones, Glasgow - I seem to remember reading that the cigarette was been airbrushed out on new copies maybe in the USA!!!!!!!! Posted by: Austin Low, Glasgow, Scotland on 2:28pm Sun 27 May 07 I think we should ban everything, bad things happen every day as a result of people being allowed to do things and I'm sick of it.
We should ban life, I know Mr Gibson will be with me! Did you know everyone who has tried life, has died, case closed. |
| Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All
Rights Reserved Terms of Use |
|