Evening Times: click here to return to our homepage
Joy as bid for flats in park is rejected
 
Local people will be consulted on what they want to do with this park
Local people will be consulted on what they want to do with this park
 

by Vivienne Nicoll

Residents are celebrating after councillors rejected plans to build flats on a small Glasgow South Side park.

Southside Housing Association had applied for permission to build a four-storey block on green space at the corner of Keir Street and Leslie Street.

It would have had 12 flats for rent, along with a Barnardo's family centre, called the Apna project, for disabled black and ethnic minority children.

However, the move sparked 214 letters of objection from people unhappy about the loss of the site, which has a number of trees.

The objectors included Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, MSPs Robert Brown and Bashir Ahmad, and MP Mohammad Sarwar.

Local people, Pollokshields Community Council, Pollokshields Heritage, the New Glasgow Society and the Architectural Heritage Society of Scotland also protested.

Steve Inch, Glasgow City Council's development and regeneration executive director, also opposed the development.

He said in a report: "The unquestioned need for the Apna project and its location in the community and the provision of social housing requires to be balanced against the impact on the area resulting from the loss of open space."

He recommended the bid be refused and was backed unanimously by the planning committee.

After the meeting, residents said they would fight to have the land protected for the future.

Andy Thomas, 30, of Leslie Street, said: "This land is very important to the community and we are grateful to everyone for their support.

"Our next step is to consult people on improvements to the park because we want to know exactly what they want to do with it.

"Saving this piece of green space is a victory for Pollokshields and Glasgow."

Planning officials are now in talks with Barnardo's in the hope of finding an alternative site for its Apna project.

Mr Thomas said: "We have won and Southside Housing Association and Barnardo's have also won because they have a commitment from the council that it will provide them with a suitable site for their development."

Barnardo's said the park location would have been ideal because it is close to the neighbourhood served by Apna, which is presently based in St Ninian's Church in Albert Drive.

Publication date 16/01/08

Posted by: People Power, Glasgow on 12:49pm Wed 16 Jan 08

Victory for common sense, and the local people.
The number of areas of green space like this being eaten up by the Commercial giants of consumerism is an indictment of our Council in even considering the option of selling off our green space in the first place.

Unless people fight hard to save their green spaces they will lose them forever, to What ?
Greedy, and ruthless commercial builders, and property developers, with the Council taking the money, and squandering it.

The number of Save Our Parks groups speaks for itself. With Glasgows Pollok Park, Botanic Gardens, and Broomhill Park all being fought for. Part of Thornwood Park was lost when property developers did a deal with the residents / council. So, none of our green spaces are entirely safe, unless we fight for them.

For the health and fitness of our younger generations, kids, and their kids again, we cannot let any more of our parks be lost in this way.
Posted by: aunt sally, glasgow on 1:19pm Wed 16 Jan 08
What is this green space used for at the moment?

no doubt just for dogs and for litter..

its all well and good saying
"Our next step is to consult people on improvements to the park because we want to know exactly what they want to do with it.

How long has it been lying like unused for !!
Posted by: People Power, Glasgow on 2:25pm Wed 16 Jan 08

Parks will only be used reguarly when the ameneties, lighting, and conditions within them are kept in check.

When any park falls into ruin, or is left to rot - naturally people will not want to use it, or walk through it - wih or without their dogs / children or friends ?

If the Community genuinely get a chance to contribute towards the upkeep and useage of this park for future generations in years to come this can only be the way forwards.

All people can hope is this is not a tokenistic, half hearted gesture from the Council with no real intention to commit any cash or resources to upgrade this park.
People who fought must speak out even more so now, but only time will tell . . . .
Posted by: mulross, Glasgow on 2:33pm Wed 16 Jan 08
Call my cynical, but I wonder if the objectors would have been listened to if it was a private developer who wanted to build flats on that land?
Posted by: trench, possilpark on 5:51pm Wed 16 Jan 08
most of the parks have been bequethed by long dead citizens who previously lived in glasgow to the people in glasgow, for instance, ross hall park,which is now a school (pardon me an academy ) the reason people found out about the school being built was through an english newspapers real estate column, ....i quote 3-4 bedroom homes in the lovely area of glasgow ,near parks shops and an academy also near transport ( this was before the dig had even begun,) hmmm, another case of treated like mushrooms ....kept in the dark and fed bull s**t.
Posted by: tam-m, southside on 9:52pm Wed 16 Jan 08
It would have had 12 flats for rent, along with a Barnardo's family centre, called the Apna project, for disabled black and ethnic minority children.-----had this centre applied as a project for disabled white children all sorts of racial issues would have been branded about so how come they can have a centre for disabled black and ethnic minority children.-segregatio
n is the birthstone of racism..
Posted by: trench, possilpark on 11:03pm Wed 16 Jan 08
the television show called 'yes minister' has the plot on how politicians operate (someone has been taking lessons)... come on gentlemen do not be so transparent with all the under handed things that are going on, the whizz kids on the computer nowadays nothing escapes the public.
Posted by: People Power, Glasgow on 11:49pm Wed 16 Jan 08

Yes trench,

nothing escapes us, thats not the issue here - it's the fact that we don't act on what we do hear!

Just how many people bother to act on news they read. Join a local activist group, Community Council, or lodge a complaint / objection to the Planning Department ?

Very few people even bother - until we ditch this apathy, and start taking responsibility for our own communities - we haven't got the right to moan informally in the classic way, at bus shelters, and in the pubs.

Speak out and voice your annoyance with our useless Cooncil, it's our right to! ( but for how much longer?)
Posted by: Heather W, Luing on 3:46pm Thu 17 Jan 08
Very true People Power - but we are being made to feel that the city, and our own little areas of it, are nothing to do with us. If you try anything through the planning process 90% of the time you've wasted your time, paper, envelope and stamp. I am beginning to feel that if you want to keep an area as a pocket of greenery residents need to buy it themselves to protect it - but then you realise that as a citizen of the good city you actually own it already - only it doesn't feel like that! GCC treats the citizens of Glasgow with contempt.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Car Hire
Copyright © 2009 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use