Evening Times: click here to return to our homepage
Probe starts over bridge’s snapped cable
 
Inspectors carried out the inspection after a cable snapped Picture: Jamie Simpson
Inspectors carried out the inspection after a cable snapped Picture: Jamie Simpson
 

by Deborah Anderson

EXPERTS on a high-rise platform have carried out a detailed inspection of the damaged Clyde Arc Bridge.

Consultants Sandberg were on site yesterday afternoon looking at the sections of a support that crashed on the road.

Equipment had been brought in to allow engineers a closer look at where the cable, known as a hanger, snapped off from the bridge on Monday night.

Local people told how they heard an "explosion" as the cable snapped and fell on the carriageway.

Hanger 10 was one of 14 securing the Arc to the carriageway.

The bridge, which is dubbed the Squinty Bridge because it crosses the river diagonally, is designed so supports can be removed one at a time for repair and maintenance.

However, council bosses decided to close the bridge for safety reasons until a full investigation was completed.

Contractors Edmund Nutall Ltd appointed consultants Sandberg, who are expected to remove the broken sections to a specialist lab for further analysis.

London-based Sandberg investigate projects hit by structural problems and will prepare a report for the bridge builders.

The 33-metre (108ft) cable weighs around 3.6tonnes.

Other cables vary between 11metres (36ft) and 35m (114ft).

The bridge is made up of 1500 tonnes of steel and 2000 cubic metres of reinforced concrete, with a span of 169m (554ft). It is 22m (72ft) wide.

It links Finnieston to Pacific Quay on the South Side and was opened in September 2006 as part of a project to regenerate the banks of the Clyde.

It was the first new city road bridge over the River Clyde since 1969.

Publication date 17/01/08

Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 11:41am Thu 17 Jan 08
So the professional engineers are now contradicting the Glasgow City Council spokeswoman's (identified in later editions of the ET as a Mr Robert Booth) initial claim that there appeared to be no "risk to the integrity of the bridge"... how very dare they!
Posted by: marty, Glasgow on 12:40pm Thu 17 Jan 08
The overall integrity of the bridge will undoubtedly be fine - it's designed to carry a light rail system in addition to road vehicles and the designed-in margins of safety are significant. However, there has obviously been a serious deficiency in the quality control of this cable support. Without wanting to second-guess the structural investigators, which I'll do anyway, my money is on a manufacturing flaw in the steelwork which wasn't detected as part of the QA process, as opposed to an inherent design fault. It's vital that all remaining supports are thoroughly inspected for micro-cracks and other flaws in integrity "in the lab" prior to the bridge reopening.
Posted by: BM, Glasgow on 12:05am Fri 18 Jan 08
Sydney Meriwether wrote:
So the professional engineers are now contradicting the Glasgow City Council spokeswoman's (identified in later editions of the ET as a Mr Robert Booth) initial claim that there appeared to be no "risk to the integrity of the bridge"... how very dare they!
The integrity of the bridge may be OK and it may not be in danger of collapse, but the prospect of another 3 ton cable coming crashing down on me while driving over it worries me!
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Car Hire
Copyright © 2009 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use