Evening Times: click here to return to our homepage
Missing link gets go-ahead
 
 
 
The extension will not use the well-know bridge to nowhere
The extension will not use the well-know bridge to nowhere
 
Steven Purcell
Steven Purcell
 

Exclusive by Brian Currie

THE go-ahead to complete the missing link of the M74 has finally been given.

After years of delays and wrangling, Scottish Transport Minister Stewart Stevenson announced today the contract had been agreed.

Work is expected to start in May and be completed by the end of 2011.

Glasgow City Council leader Steven Purcell said it was "tremendous news for jobs, for commuters and for the 2014 Commonwealth Games".

The deal was reached after a fixed price was agreed of £445million, plus an allowance of £12m for the possible treatment of mine workings on the route.

40-year dream to become a reality

EXTENDING the M74 through Glasgow has been under starter's orders for the last 40 years but will now become a reality before thousands of spectators arrive in the city for the 2014 Commonwealth Games.

And it will play a pivotal role in the regeneration of the East End with major leisure, business and residential projects helping to create thousands of new jobs in communities long blighted by poverty.

Bypassing the daily bottleneck of vehicles stuck on the Kingston Bridge was first mooted in the 60s. Manufacturers repeatedly complained lengthy delays slowed down the movement of goods from the West of Scotland to market places around the world.

Campaigners argued that extending the M74 by just five miles from the Fullarton Interchange to link with the M8 west of the Kingston Bridge would also be a major catalyst in the regeneration of rundown areas such as Parkhead.

There's to be the East End Regeneration Route - a new four-lane road - which will connect the M74 extension from Polmadie to Rutherglen Bridge, the Gallowgate, Provan Road via Parkhead Forge and then on to the M8.

It's part of a £1.6billion project to breathe new life into East End communities.

The economic benefits which will be triggered by today's decision to put in place the so-called "missing link" will be enormous but the scheme looked to be in jeopardy until environmentalists with Friends of the Earth abandoned their controversial threat of a legal challenge.

All the work will be carried out by the sole bidder for the project, Interlink M74, a joint venture involving Morgan Est, Balfour Beatty, Morrison Construction and Sir Robert McAlpine.

The five-mile route will run from Fullarton junction, near Carmyle, to the M8 just west of the Kingston Bridge. It will pass over some of the most contaminated and polluted parts of Scotland and will help transform urban wasteland into business and residential areas.

Completion of the route will significantly reduce congestion on the busiest stretch of the M8 through Glasgow and provide a major economic boost to west Scotland.

The south and east of Glasgow, Rutherglen and Cambuslang will all benefit.

Business leaders believe the scheme will return significantly more than its cost.

A Scottish Enterprise spokesman said: "We are pleased the extension has got the go-ahead.

"The economic benefits of an effective transport network are well documented and the road will open up large parts of the city and beyond to significant new investment opportunities."

Glasgow Shettleston MSP Frank McAveety said: "It will be a major benefit for the Glasgow economy. It will make a massive difference to the job opportunities in the East End."

Although Mr Stevenson said the Government had always been committed to the project, there had been fears of further delays because ministers would only guarantee it would be completed in time for the 2014 Games.

Although details of how the contract will be funded are still to emerge, it is believed the deal was concluded only after the city council agreed to front-load its contribution.

Today, Mr Stevenson backed the plan: "Following an internal review of the procurement processes the Government is confident the procedures are robust.

"We are happy for Glasgow City Council to award the contract to the Interlink M74 Joint Venture.

"This extension will complete the motorway network and reduce congestion on the busiest stretch of the M8. It will also provide links to regeneration projects in the East End and bring much-needed new investment.

"This project is also a crucial piece of the infrastructure required to provide excellent transport facilities for the visitors and athletes expected in the city as a result of the 2014 Games.

"The bid achieves value for money and I am determined to ensure there is robust management of this scheme to protect the public purse."

A report by consultants EC Harris for Transport Scotland said the bid represented "clear value for money" when it was compared to current construction costs.

Around £200m has already been invested in the project on securing land and advanced works.

Plans to complete the missing link were first announced in September 2000, but the project has been beset by delays.

Draft Road and Compulsory Purchase Orders were published in March 2003.

A Public Local Inquiry ran from December 2003 to March 2004 resulting in a decision to proceed with the scheme in March 2005.

Friends of the Earth lodged an appeal against the decision in May 2005 but the environment group abandoned its appeal in June 2006, ending the statutory processes.

The tendering process then began in August 2006.

Publication date 14/02/08

Posted by: jkr, Lochwinnoch Greater Glasgow on 10:59am Thu 14 Feb 08
This is great news. It will be a great improvement not only for the city itself but also for all the surrounding areas and beyond. Access to the airport from the east will also be greatly improved.
Posted by: Meep, Shawlands on 11:07am Thu 14 Feb 08
Did the Green party not lodge a claim at the EU parliament that the bid process was illegal? And is this not still on going?
Posted by: Eric Flack, Drumchapel on 11:32am Thu 14 Feb 08
Should the Green Party not be liable for extra costs incurred due to delays on their part over various planning and procedural matters? The Green party delayed work and the costs went up.Why should we pay for their intransigence?
Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 11:37am Thu 14 Feb 08
Wow .Well done Glasgow for taking this step forward,Now for crossrail
Posted by: jrb, Glasgow on 11:45am Thu 14 Feb 08
Meep wrote:
Did the Green party not lodge a claim at the EU parliament that the bid process was illegal? And is this not still on going?
Lets just get on and build the thing,and not entertain any hold ups from the likes of the green party,people are fed up listening to these doom merchants
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 11:56am Thu 14 Feb 08
Great, symbolic photo of Mr Purcell from the ET, the background (GPO building) epitomises his time as leader: a temporary facade fronted by gross commercialism, obscuring the reality of a litany of delay, deception and huge costs to taxpayers.
Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 12:12pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Maybe ditch any plans for Junction In RUTHERGLEN!
Posted by: John, Glasgow on 12:15pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Thank F--- for that!
I for one am sick to the teeth of the greens and carbon foot print this and carbon footprint that. For forty odd years we have been sitting on the bridge and now maybe our city can take off again HOORAY!!!!!!!
Posted by: Brad, Glasgow on 12:24pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Oh Sydney, you drama queen, tell us which of Glasgow's (or other Councils') recent leaders you prefer. Alternatively, you could characterise Purcell's time as one of rising confidence in the city, progress on increasing the levels of jobs and investment, reining in the city's Council Tax (previously Scotland's highest), and seeing the deprivation indicators starting to improve (although they're still bad).

Your bitter personal (and largely unsubstantiated) attacks suggest a misunderstanding of the power of the Council Leader (not really that much). Purcell is largely a figurehead.
Posted by: cee, Glasgow on 12:57pm Thu 14 Feb 08
It is so refreshing to read that commonsense prevails amongst a good number of people on here today (with a few exceptions) in relation to the positive responses to the M74 extension.

Pity those NIMBY whatsits from SPP down the road don't have the same insight into progress in relation to the Pollok Park issue.
Posted by: Seymour Hope, Glasgow on 1:23pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Dear Green party protesters. Get it up yeah you bunch of long haired unwashed hippies who like to protest against development but never come up with tangible solutions social or civil infrastructure problem. Thank god this country got developed enough to give us clean drinking water and a sewage infrastructure before you had a voivce otherwise we would still have open sewers and be collecting rain water to ****.
Posted by: marty, Glasgow on 1:32pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Sydney Meriwether wrote:
Great, symbolic photo of Mr Purcell from the ET, the background (GPO building) epitomises his time as leader: a temporary facade fronted by gross commercialism, obscuring the reality of a litany of delay, deception and huge costs to taxpayers.
Tee hee, I love your daily rants against Mr Purcell and how he's somehow personally responsible for all of mankind's woes!

The Sidney doth protest too much... did the pair of you have an acrimonious split in the past?
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, At home on 2:44pm Thu 14 Feb 08
marty wrote:
Sydney Meriwether wrote: Great, symbolic photo of Mr Purcell from the ET, the background (GPO building) epitomises his time as leader: a temporary facade fronted by gross commercialism, obscuring the reality of a litany of delay, deception and huge costs to taxpayers.
Tee hee, I love your daily rants against Mr Purcell and how he's somehow personally responsible for all of mankind's woes! The Sidney doth protest too much... did the pair of you have an acrimonious split in the past?
Apart from cementing my lawn, no, and even that turned out for the better....

Mr Purcell is largely a figurehead, you know, and he's actually a very friendly, amenable and jocular chap, so I'm sure he takes things in the spirit and context they are offered.
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, At home on 2:56pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Your bitter personal attacks....

Ooops, sorry brad, nearly missed you hiding in the bushes there! If you actually read what I wrote:

....epitomises his time as leader....

it's clear taht this is referring to his (or to accept your logic, his administration's) performance, it is not about him personally (see above), but then I'm sure you already knew that and just got the big spoon out anyway. ;-)
Posted by: JayBrown, Helensburgh on 3:13pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Finally this important piece of infrastructure is being built. I am sick to death of the greens especially Patrick Harvie always harping on about road tolls and public Transport. I he made a pledge to reduce fares on the trains then i might use them. £8 return from Helensburgh to Queen Street is preposterous and a lot cheaper to take the car even with petrol prices as high as they are. I bet has hasn't queued on the Kingston Bridge for hours waiting to get through the city. Will be godd with regeneration of the East of the City, something which has been needed for a while. If it was upto the greens this would be a farm or wildlife habitat!!! Well done Glasgow City Council and the M74 consortium!
Posted by: Brad, Glasgow on 3:23pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Sorry, Syd, it's just when you say things like... "a concerted effort by council leader Purcell and his manipulative, rich chums in big business to attack all forms of public service provision"; or "Purcell is determined to decimate council-managed service provision"; or "huge profits for those who stroke Purcell's ego, and are duly rewarded with key posts in the new setup", well, it does sound a bit personal to me...
Posted by: Brad, Glasgow on 3:25pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Sounds like a Bond baddie... I wonder if Purcell has a white ****?
Posted by: Brad, Glasgow on 3:27pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Hey ET, replacing my five-letter word with 4 asterisks make it look worse than it was! (I meant it as "cat", of course...)
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 3:41pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Aye, are you sure Brad, five letters and white and cat-related.... I'm beginning to wonder!

Anyway as you're quote rightly reflects I refer to Mr Purcell as 'council leader', so anything after that is in that context.
Posted by: bossman, lanarkshire on 4:16pm Thu 14 Feb 08
This is brilliant news and about time the greens were shown their place. They are...AN INSIGNIFANT MINORITY who are given to much credence.
Posted by: Wallace_Arnold, Glasgow on 4:27pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Such excitement over the building of a.......road.

I thought some new technological development had been started in the East End! Honestly, we're like cavemen getting excited over a piece of concrete.
Posted by: Andrew Stephen, Cumbernauld on 4:57pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Now can we have Glasgow Crossrail and the re-opening of the Edinburgh Suburban Rail Line!
Posted by: Ian, Glasgow on 5:02pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Excellent news! This will finally open up the south and east to get some decent regeneration work done. This will also finally reduce some of the traffic across the Kingston Bridge and much improve access for the east of the city and the Lanarkshire towns to the Airport.

Great news for Glasgow!
Posted by: People Power, Glasgow on 5:39pm Thu 14 Feb 08

It was bound to happen - like the M77 extension / diversionary route through Pollok Park. It was just a matter of when ?

As ambivolous as I am about this - being so aware of the "Jam74" campaign, for environmental, as well as practical reasons.

See: www. jam74. org

Obviously peoples houses will have to be demolished to allow for the route of this link up. Clearly those posting are not the affected ones who's perhaps lifetime homes will bulldozed.


Also, as this will cost £445 million on top of the hundereds of millions the 2014 Commonwealth Games - EXACTLY WHERE THE HE** WILL THIS MONEY COME FROM - THIN AIR ?

This for me raises more questions than answers, despite the clear celebratory mood from some obvious drivers ( who probably don't know what a bus is!)

The cost implications of the M74 & 2014 Commonwelath Games will clearly see a cut in Public Services, an innevitable increase in Council Tax ; potential loss of "free personal care" ; even School meals could be affected.

So, beware all those who celebrate so soon!
This could see egg on all your faces, when your services are pulled out from underneath you, and costs in all areas are hiked right up!
Posted by: People Power, Glasgow on 6:19pm Thu 14 Feb 08

Aye lovely terms there - NOT! ha ha! - not sure that anybodys s.exuality (if I'm aloud to say that without asterisks blocking part of the word!)is relevant these days!

What Purcell does or doesn't do in his job is another matter!

And, as I speak to more & more people - nobody seems to speak highly of him, regard him with utter respect - ( unless their Labour Councillor) & even them the back benchers probably back stab him!

His slimey trails he leaves behind him make me think he's is sluggish in more ways than one!
Posted by: absent_not_vacant, London on 6:54pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Well done Glasgow. It only took 40 years. It looks like ripping out the heart of the city all those years ago might pay off after all.
Or is it the surest sign yet that the age of the car is over? (only kidding about that bit).
Posted by: Donny, Glasgow on 8:56pm Thu 14 Feb 08
Hallebloodyluiah is all I am going to say!!

Now I can get the steamers home quicker to cambuslang and instead of putting up with a 20 minute earbashing from 4 of them having to pay a taxi fare approx £4 each (Bus prices at 3am in the morning!!)....I can now only endure this for 10 minutes thanks to "The Link"
Posted by: leesome, Glasgow on 11:17pm Thu 14 Feb 08
All involved. BRAVO!
Posted by: People Power, Glasgow on 12:33am Fri 15 Feb 08

Yet more major roadworks and disruption - delays, hitches, problems, and tailbacks on it's surrounding motorways - Wonderful!

Can Glasgow ever have a period when it is NOT demolishing, re - building, digging up its roads or carrying out major works on its so called infrastructure - ha ha!

Posted by: Donny, Glasgow on 8:01am Fri 15 Feb 08
People Power wrote:

Yet more major roadworks and disruption - delays, hitches, problems, and tailbacks on it's surrounding motorways - Wonderful!

Can Glasgow ever have a period when it is NOT demolishing, re - building, digging up its roads or carrying out major works on its so called infrastructure - ha ha!

Ahhh, thats the price of progress PP ;)
Posted by: Scott, Airdrie on 8:54am Fri 15 Feb 08
JayBrown - "£8 return from Helensburgh to Queen Street is preposterous and a lot cheaper to take the car even with petrol prices as high as they are."

That's about 45 miles at the TRUE running cost of a car (say 30p a mile), equals £13.50. Add in the cost of parking, the wasted time sitting in traffic, etc. and you still think it's "a lot cheaper"? Or are you basing your assessment on just the cost of fuel?

I'm glad the project is going ahead, but it always amazes me how, in their attempts to justify car use on cost grounds, people are willing to ignore the true costs in terms of wear & tear, depreciation, servicing and buying the car in the first place.

Posted by: JayBrown, Helensburgh on 10:43am Fri 15 Feb 08
Scott - There are many things i am basing my assessment on. I can never get a seat on the train so i am standing for 45 mins, which isn't exactly comfortable. The conductors are rude and if the conductor hasn't got to you before Queen Street, you get the grumpy lot next to the ticket barriers, yet another inconvience with a mile long queue. Then there is the 10 minute walk to my office! The trains are reguarly late and delayed. Parking isnt a problem as i get that as part of my job free, so no charge there. I would still say it is cheaper, even with the congestion. Oh yes and look what happened recently with the landslip at Dalreoch, caused chaos. I am guessing you don't have a car with your list of criticisms. I took the train several times last year and found that it was more expensive, crowded, uncomfortable and had appalling customer service. For me the car wins outright. Until we have a rail system similar to the Swiss i will be avaioding the trains whereever possible! Thank goodness this project is going ahead, i will be abel to get to work even quicker!!!
Posted by: Scott, Airdrie on 1:38pm Fri 15 Feb 08
JayBrown wrote:
Scott - There are many things i am basing my assessment on. I can never get a seat on the train so i am standing for 45 mins, which isn't exactly comfortable. The conductors are rude and if the conductor hasn't got to you before Queen Street, you get the grumpy lot next to the ticket barriers, yet another inconvience with a mile long queue. Then there is the 10 minute walk to my office! The trains are reguarly late and delayed. Parking isnt a problem as i get that as part of my job free, so no charge there. I would still say it is cheaper, even with the congestion. Oh yes and look what happened recently with the landslip at Dalreoch, caused chaos. I am guessing you don't have a car with your list of criticisms. I took the train several times last year and found that it was more expensive, crowded, uncomfortable and had appalling customer service. For me the car wins outright. Until we have a rail system similar to the Swiss i will be avaioding the trains whereever possible! Thank goodness this project is going ahead, i will be abel to get to work even quicker!!!
JayBrown,

Don't make assumptions about something you know nothing about - I DO have a car, and I could also park free at work, but the fact is that it IS cheaper by train when you take into account all the costs involved, so I only use the car when I have to travel elsewhere. I also find a 10 minute walk doesn't kill me. The car is 30 minutes on a good day, 50 on a bad day, and sometimes 2 hours - the train is 30 minutes, consistently.
I find the trains are generally reliable, and I can at least catch up on some reading/watching, unlike when stuck in a traffic jam for hours - and the staff are generally only as rude as passengers are to them.

Maybe if you took the train more than "several times" in a year you would be in a better position to make an informed judgement, rather than sweeping generalisations like "never" getting a seat (it's quite easy if you time it right). You might also recognise the difference between "criticisms" and "facts".

A landslip is hardly justification for dismissing train travel out of hand - the same has happened on the roads before.

Interesting to see how much effect a motorway link in the east end of Glsgow helps your journey in from Helensburgh - the opposite direction.
Posted by: JayBrown, Helensburgh on 3:28pm Fri 15 Feb 08
Scott - The M74 link will have a huge impact on my journey relieving the congestion on the kingston bridge, making the journey a lot quicker. I also have relatives in Easterhouse who i visit reguarly so i use the motorway beyond the City pretty often. Its maybe 30 minutes on the train from Airdire to Glasgow, but its certainly not that from Helensburgh. Also, i am never rude to the conductors on the train, they are the ones with the attitude, let me also point out that they never do anything about neds on the train smoking!!! A landslip is only one reason there are several, engineering work, stikes and the constant price hikes on tickets with no improvement in comfort. I have now stayed in Helensburgh and surrounding areas for over 15 years and never has there been a landslip on the road route i take to Glasgow! There is also the frequency if trains to take into consideration. There are only 2 trains an hour. I am a very organised person, never late but hate being restricted by only two trains an hour. By several i mean at least once a week and, coming from Airdire you would know how busy the trains are in Helensburgh!!! I leave early, get stuck in a jam for about 10 15 mins then get into the city. With the M74 completed there will be an even shorter delay. mmmmm what would you rather have, the comfort of your own car, climate control and music or a smelly, hot and cramped train , i wonder!!!
Posted by: Scott, Airdrie on 9:02pm Fri 15 Feb 08
At least it's nice to see you've stopped trying to justify your refusal to use public transport on the grounds of cost....

Funny how you complain about having to spend hour trapped on the Kingston Bridge and then try to sell it as the better option!! You'll note that I didn't say you were rude to staff, just that I have no reason to slag their attitude (would you fancy challenging a ned for smoking on their wages, when it's not their job?), and I don't understand how you can have as much of a problem getting a seat from Helenslummer when that's where the train starts - mind you, I suppose folk are keen to get out of it - best thing ever to come out of Helenslummer is the train to Airdire (as you call it).

As soon as you make your mind up whether the morning jam is "10 15 mins" or "hours" you might be able to make some consistent sense, but for now I'll enjoy the (seated) company of the non-smelly people on the train from Airdrie, get there consistently on time (3 or 4 days a week, not one), listen to music, read the paper, arrive relaxed and ready for a quick stroll into work, all the time saving money. You can continue to delude yourself that your choice to use your car is on cost grounds, bleating about rising train fares but ignoring soaring fuel prices.

Maybe you could move to somewhere with a better train service, or is public transport, in fact, beneath you?
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Car Hire
Copyright © 2009 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use