Evening Times: click here to return to our homepage
Two teachers and 31 kids get fines for dropping litter
 
 

by Sarah Swain

A TOTAL of 31 pupils and at least two teachers face fines for dropping litter in Glasgow during the first week of a controversial campaign.

The under-16s had the £50 fixed penalties sent to their homes after being caught by litter enforcement patrols outside 10 city schools.

The crackdown began last Monday as part of the £4million Clean Glasgow campaign.

It is understood at least two teachers were also caught dropping litter in the first five days, though officials admit that figure may be higher as teachers are automatically included in the list of adults who have been caught throughout the city.

Steven Purcell, leader of Glasgow City Council, said: "We are very pleased with the success of the first week of our schools enforcement programme.

"Through a combination of education and enforcement we can deter the minority of pupils who drop litter in and around their communities and that this will make Glasgow a cleaner and more pleasant place in which to live, learn and work."

Every one of the city's 29 state and six private secondary schools will be visited by wardens every day for a week - followed by a repeat visit for another week - over the next two months.

If a pupil is caught littering, a warden asks for their name and address.

Unlike adults, the youngsters are not handed the fixed penalty ticket, which must be paid within 14 days.

Instead, the fine is sent to the pupil's home address, which is checked with the school.

A letter is also sent to the child's parents explaining what has happened.

Parents of the 28,300 pupils at the council-run schools have been warned of the move in letters sent home with children.

Private schools have also been told of the campaign.

Glasgow City Council is focusing its schools campaign on areas near burger vans, takeaways and shops but not playgrounds.

If the children - or their parents - fail to pay within 14 days the council has the option of pursuing the fine via the courts where the maximum fine is £2500.

However, Glasgow council officials have admitted that, because of Scottish law, children won't be taken to court for refusing to pay a litter fine.

The plan to target schoolchildren has sparked debate with critics accusing the council of picking on pupils when they should be concentrating on the mess left by louts spilling out of venues after a night out.

But other residents are supportive, saying they are fed-up of the mess left in their communities by pupils.

So far 500 adults have been reported to prosecutors over unpaid fines in the year-long litter crusade, which is supported by the Evening Times.

As revealed last week, the number of people fined since the campaign began is 8000.

Businesses, including banks Halifax Bank of Scotland, have also been hit with 400 fines. Other retail offenders include Starbucks and Subway.

Publication date 27/02/08

Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, At home on 11:12am Wed 27 Feb 08
...and meantime in the real Glasgow world gangsters recreate movie-scene carnage and murder on our streets and serious sexual assaults in the city centre continue to go unchecked... but not to worry, a few kids have been given penalty notices they can safely throw away without any fear of having to pay a fine!
Posted by: jenniewilson, Glasgow on 11:25am Wed 27 Feb 08
Syndey, 11.12

Do you sit at home poised for an Evening Times story about litter, just ready to pounce with your negative comments?

I want to see everything you mentioned stopped (although the movie reference is clearly based on this week's court case and the police having arrested people). That doesn't mean we have to put up with litter that makes our city look awful too.

If you're happy seeing the city look like a tip, then that's your right. However if not then it would at least be useful to hear your ideas, rather than just constantly criticising people who are at least doinbg something about it
Posted by: Pete, Glasgow on 11:44am Wed 27 Feb 08
Really well done. Another 33 people on the list.

A question for the Evening Times: how many of its own employees are on the list?
Posted by: witterquick, Glasgow on 12:51pm Wed 27 Feb 08
I agree with these fines. People need a shock before they realise that they can't be lazy when it comes to litter, and if that shock is to the wallet then so be it
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 1:03pm Wed 27 Feb 08
based on this week's court case

jenniewilson, I would just like to say very well done to you for correctly putting the apostrophe in "week's"; far too often, in my opinion, writers fail to correctly deploy the possessive form when referring to time-based nouns.
Posted by: jenniewilson, Glasgow on 1:27pm Wed 27 Feb 08
Sydney. Thank you for the appreciation of my punctuation, I do try!

I hate to see anything look untidy, whether it's a sentence or a pavement...
Posted by: ex labour voter, glasgow on 2:46pm Wed 27 Feb 08
Sydney Meriwether wrote:
...and meantime in the real Glasgow world gangsters recreate movie-scene carnage and murder on our streets and serious sexual assaults in the city centre continue to go unchecked... but not to worry, a few kids have been given penalty notices they can safely throw away without any fear of having to pay a fine!
Well said Sydney.
The only good thing to come out of this is that liebour and purcell will lose votes and the ET will lose another 33 customers.
Purcell will find out what zero tolerance means when the parents of the kids that were targeted by his minions who hang around school gates spying on their children vote at the next elections.
Posted by: Bri, Glasgow on 2:55pm Wed 27 Feb 08
The photograph looks staged to me... especially as it's taken outside of my work, & across the road from the COUNCIL OFFICES on India Street.

Wouldn't it be funny if it wasn't though, & the guy being "fined" hadn't signed a disclosure form allowing the photograph to be published....haha
Posted by: roor06, glasgow on 7:03pm Wed 27 Feb 08
Only 33 pupils in 10 schools over a five day period ...
Looks like the kids are not the big offenders they are being made out to be !!!
Posted by: Renegade, Cyberspace on 9:39pm Wed 27 Feb 08
witterquick wrote:
I agree with these fines. People need a shock before they realise that they can't be lazy when it comes to litter, and if that shock is to the wallet then so be it
Home in on schoolkids and their teachers why not? I wonder if they would be as quick to move in on gangs who throw their broken glass Buckfast bottles on the streets.

Would you be as quick to fine them, Louis? Somehow I don't think so.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Car Hire
Copyright © 2009 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use