Evening Times: click here to return to our homepage
Inside story as the new GPO takes shape
 
 
 
 

Exclusive by Marianne Taylor

WALKING through George Square you'd never know that just a few metres away one of Glasgow's most ambitious architectural transformations is taking place.

But as our pictures show the 127-year-old former GPO building, which lay derelict for more than a decade, is being turned into one of the UK's most prestigious office complexes.

By this time next year the enormous 127,000sq ft G1 complex will be near completion.

Site owners HF Developments hope by then the nine-storey building - crowned with a striking glass roof - will be the city's latest architectural masterpiece.

And although there's plenty of work to be done a peak behind the scenes reveals the progress made in the last six months.

Two 8-ton cranes tower over the entire development, 60m above the giant pipes that form a temporary support structure for the building.

Workmen say the huge central lift shaft that protrudes from the ground in the middle of the site is growing taller by the day.

In a few weeks the huge steel structure that will support the building will be erected, in preparation for the final push.

At the same time the beautiful Victorian stonework that forms the facade of the building will require pains-taking care.

Every one of the balustrades that run along the top of the building will have to be removed, cleaned, stored and re-aligned before the roof goes on.

But, according to HF, all the hard work will be worthwhile.

They hope to attract some of the country's most prestigious businesses to the building.

Spokeswoman Alison Fitch said: "This is such an exciting project and it is wonderful to see the progress being made.

"We look forward to seeing the GPO finally completed next year.

"We are confident it will return to its former position as one of Glasgow's landmark buildings."

Previous attempts to develop the building, such as converting it into a Scottish National Gallery, a hotel, health club, shops and bars, all fell through.

Stefan King, head of leisure firm G1 Group, bought it in 1999 for £5million to turn it into a hotel.

But that never happened and pressure mounted for him to sell it to another developer.

AWG Property and HF Developments bought the A-listed building for £11.75m in 2005. Construction is expected to cost £30-£35m with the final cost estimated at £70m.

Changing faces of the GPO

But then it was turned into an advert...

And the world's biggest Christmas card...

And finally a giant picture of itself...

But this is the shape of the future...

Publication date 03/03/08

Posted by: Vernon Mount, Newcastle on 2:29pm Mon 3 Mar 08
What a shrill this whitewashed article causes...there is no GPO building left on that site...it is like the skin of a snake left discarded as no longer of use...to become a piece of stage set for the frivolous comic tampering by the developers in their continouse efforts to undermine under resourced conservation bodies. What would Frank Worsdale say of his city today? We thought we had won these battles. The developers of our generation will be viewed by posterity with the same resentment as the planners and architects of the post-war period. Do we not realise how much we have lost of what was one of the greatest urban experiences in Europe. We have seen the building line of numerous classically influenced buildings being eroded by greed. The parapet of this facade should be sacrosanct. After a similar dismall intervention to roof of the former County Buildings, what hope for Egyptian Halls when it is eventually saved...we hope!
Posted by: Steven Glaswegian, Edinburgh (Unfortunatley!) on 4:28pm Mon 3 Mar 08
Moan, moan, moan! Maybe the GPO building should have been left to rot or just demolished completley. Cities change and have to evolve as do buildings and their uses. I daresay it is probably costing the developers a hell of alot more to save the shell of the GPO than it would to clear the site and build from scratch. So if adding some extra floors can allay the cost of facade retention then so be it. These companies are in business to make money. If they weren't then we would have lost a hell of alot more of 'what was one of the greatest urban experiences in Europe'!
Posted by: Ian, Glasgow on 4:41pm Mon 3 Mar 08
Steven Glaswegian wrote:
Moan, moan, moan! Maybe the GPO building should have been left to rot or just demolished completley. Cities change and have to evolve as do buildings and their uses. I daresay it is probably costing the developers a hell of alot more to save the shell of the GPO than it would to clear the site and build from scratch. So if adding some extra floors can allay the cost of facade retention then so be it. These companies are in business to make money. If they weren't then we would have lost a hell of alot more of 'what was one of the greatest urban experiences in Europe'!
Well said Steven - people are never happy!

I think the new building will look great, I just wish they'd hurry up and finish it. It seems to have been in that state for ages and ages and ages..... yawn
Posted by: Whatever, Wherever on 5:53pm Mon 3 Mar 08
Ian wrote:
Steven Glaswegian wrote: Moan, moan, moan! Maybe the GPO building should have been left to rot or just demolished completley. Cities change and have to evolve as do buildings and their uses. I daresay it is probably costing the developers a hell of alot more to save the shell of the GPO than it would to clear the site and build from scratch. So if adding some extra floors can allay the cost of facade retention then so be it. These companies are in business to make money. If they weren't then we would have lost a hell of alot more of 'what was one of the greatest urban experiences in Europe'!
Well said Steven - people are never happy! I think the new building will look great, I just wish they'd hurry up and finish it. It seems to have been in that state for ages and ages and ages..... yawn
I'll go with you two.
Posted by: Vernon Mount, Newcastle on 1:27pm Tue 4 Mar 08
I'm glad to see the developers have such good friends among the citizens of Glasgow. I think you'll find the GPO WAS left to rot! The reason for any additional costs to be recouped is in part due to Stefan King sitting on the building and undertaking no redevelopment work and little or no maintenance doubling his money in the process. Developers owning listed buildings have a legally binding duty to keep them in good state of repair. In this case someone managed to make a substantial profit whilst do nothing for the building. Local Authorities do not have the financial might to enforce through the courts and developers know this very well. Every city needs developers, but they must also display some level altruism toward the city in which they invest.
Posted by: Vernon Mount, Newcastle on 1:38pm Tue 4 Mar 08
Developers have proven to be highly adept at demolishing listed buildings. Take for example the two warehouses, Thompson in influence at least, on Bell Street and Watson Street. They are now a memory and the site redevloped, why? It ensured greater profit to the developers to permit the building to rot beyond salvation rather than be saved. Glasgow continues to lose a far greater percentage of its historic building stock than almost any other major city in the country. Your comments would be better placed supporting these vulnerable edifices...the developer will survive regardless. Anyone unaware of how much has been lost should look to virutualmitchell.com
. As Worsdale said, The City that Disappeared.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Car Hire
Copyright © 2009 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use