![]() |
Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 10:55am Mon 12 May 08 Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 10:59am Mon 12 May 08 Posted by: Pete, Glasgow on 12:37pm Mon 12 May 08 Another useless poll! Is enough being spent? Well, I don't know as the article isn't very clear on how much is being spent currently, the projected costs of restoring glasgow's historic buildings or how many buildings qualify as historic. So the question really is: do you give a stuff about historic buildings? Posted by: Tarry breeks, Partick on 1:42pm Mon 12 May 08 Posted by: leesome, Glasgow on 1:53pm Mon 12 May 08 Posted by: Edna Bucket, People Not Steeples on 3:55pm Mon 12 May 08 I think it would have been better spent on new affordable housing for folk to live in actually as it stands, its just for starlings to crap on! 200k to fill some cracks! am sure that is one helluva lot of Polyfilla, could have build a new b and q for 200K Posted by: tam-m, southside on 7:00pm Mon 12 May 08 this building should be dismantled and rebuilt in the west end for everyone to admire. they should also reinstate the hangings for the likes of the 20 year old scumbag who thinks mugging 80 year olds at knife point is what he is entitled to do. Posted by: Meep, Shawlands on 8:09pm Mon 12 May 08 If the tolbooth steeple at the Trongate is ruined then the labour party in Glasgow will be guilty of allowing national treasures like the steelpe to be ruined. And if so a witche's curse will await them..... Posted by: George Brown, glasgow on 9:34pm Mon 12 May 08 pull it down and rebuild it under the collapsible bridge, it needs all the support it can get In Glasgow old properties were termed slums and demolished to make way for new builds In Edinburgh old properties are called historical sites and visitors are charged for access Posted by: celtic4, United States on 2:10am Tue 13 May 08 Here in America, we cherish our old buildings and they are listed on Historical Sites. I believe in the history of a place, and with Scotland's wonderful history, I feel it should be continued in toto for as long as possible. After all, do you really think tourists come just to shop at Tesco's? haha Posted by: celtic4, United States on 2:13am Tue 13 May 08 Further, to those who recommend rebuilding it, please don't do that! Look at the wonderful old fountain they have "rebuilt" in Linlithgow Palace! It doesn't even look the same at all, neverminding the fact that it now works some weekends. Look at the historical significance that is now gone. Posted by: Roy Batty, Glasgow on 12:21pm Wed 14 May 08 "Another useless poll! Is enough being spent? ...do you give a stuff about historic buildings?"
It's not a poll, it's a building survey of an important aspect of Glasgow's built heritage. Those buildings belong to the city of Glasgow and it's occupants. I do think that if you were to ask the population if they cared about the city's historic buildings, the answer would be a resounding yes. In any case most historic buildings, once restored, are put to use as venues, museums etc, not set in aspic, therefore adding value to the cultural environment. |
| Copyright © 2009 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All
Rights Reserved Terms of Use |
|