Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 11:15am Thu 29 May 08
If it wasn't about the future prosperity of our great city, then you would have to laugh at the [bold]retroactive incompetence[/bold] of the decrepit New Labour controlled Glasgow City Council 'administration'.
On Tuesday the ET publishes an article detailing the lengthy failings of GCC in waste management... then on Thursday we've got the "it wisnae us, it wiz a big boy and he ran away" story from people who are supposed to lead this city.
[bold]Wit a bunch a nyaffs![/bold]
If it wasn't about the future prosperity of our great city, then you would have to laugh at the
retroactive incompetence of the decrepit New Labour controlled Glasgow City Council 'administration'.
On Tuesday the ET publishes an article detailing the lengthy failings of GCC in waste management... then on Thursday we've got the "it wisnae us, it wiz a big boy and he ran away" story from people who are supposed to lead this city.
Wit a bunch a nyaffs!Posted by: robertgrey, Glasgow on 11:54am Thu 29 May 08
If I spend 23 hours a day being self important and angry on the internet; will the bit about a big boy doing it and running away eventually appear in this story for me too?
If I spend 23 hours a day being self important and angry on the internet; will the bit about a big boy doing it and running away eventually appear in this story for me too?
Posted by: The Lurgan Tiger on 12:22pm Thu 29 May 08
#1
So by your inference, if, for example, our schools are failing, we shouldn't try to solve the issue, we should just blame those at fault?
#1
So by your inference, if, for example, our schools are failing, we shouldn't try to solve the issue, we should just blame those at fault?
Posted by: Pete, Glasgow on 12:35pm Thu 29 May 08
[quote]The news comes just two days after Scottish Government figures showed Glasgow City Council had the worst record in Scotland for recycling household rubbish.[/quote]
And two days after the Council themselves tried to tell us they were so skint they had to cut back on the education budget (amongst others). A'hm confused.
The news comes just two days after Scottish Government figures showed Glasgow City Council had the worst record in Scotland for recycling household rubbish.
And two days after the Council themselves tried to tell us they were so skint they had to cut back on the education budget (amongst others). A'hm confused.
Posted by: Stewie Griffin, Glasgow on 1:34pm Thu 29 May 08
Yet another rehashed story. It will come to nothing as per usual.
Yet another rehashed story. It will come to nothing as per usual.
Posted by: Tarry breeks, Partick on 1:34pm Thu 29 May 08
Lurgan Tiger, Meriwether only has criticisms and condemnation [bold]never[/bold] positive suggestions or praise.
Lurgan Tiger, Meriwether only has criticisms and condemnation
never positive suggestions or praise.
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, At home on 3:09pm Thu 29 May 08
[quote][bold]The Lurgan Tiger[/bold] wrote:
#1
So by your inference, if, for example, our schools are failing, we shouldn't try to solve the issue, we should just blame those at fault?[/quote] Thanks TLT, I appreciate you acknowledging that I am the cream of the crop in this barrel of chimps, but you can [italic]just call me Sydney[/italic].
As for your point: that may be your (mis)interpretation, but there's a wee hint to my point in the bold text, i.e [bold]retroactive incompetence[/bold].
[bold]We need a competent administration[/bold] which can solve problems on a practical timescale, not sit on their bulging wallets waiting for a stumbling local newspaper to kick their behinds into gear.
The Lurgan Tiger wrote:
#1
So by your inference, if, for example, our schools are failing, we shouldn't try to solve the issue, we should just blame those at fault?
Thanks TLT, I appreciate you acknowledging that I am the cream of the crop in this barrel of chimps, but you can
just call me Sydney.
As for your point: that may be your (mis)interpretation, but there's a wee hint to my point in the bold text, i.e
retroactive incompetence.
We need a competent administration which can solve problems on a practical timescale, not sit on their bulging wallets waiting for a stumbling local newspaper to kick their behinds into gear.
Posted by: hightower, glasgow on 4:53pm Thu 29 May 08
i think its a great idea if it works. HOWEVER will we be made to pay for it and then a private company take all the proifts?
i think its a great idea if it works. HOWEVER will we be made to pay for it and then a private company take all the proifts?
Posted by: mulross, Glasgow on 6:13pm Thu 29 May 08
[quote][bold]hightower[/bold] wrote:
i think its a great idea if it works. HOWEVER will we be made to pay for it and then a private company take all the proifts?[/quote] Well, that does seem to be the way that Glasgow is going these days. Just look at the plans to let Go Ape rake in the money from Pollok Park, while us mugs pay for the car parks and toilets etc for their customers.
Regardless how much money is spent on recyling facilities,it will make little difference as long as so many Glaswegians are not prepared to use the facilities.
hightower wrote:
i think its a great idea if it works. HOWEVER will we be made to pay for it and then a private company take all the proifts?
Well, that does seem to be the way that Glasgow is going these days. Just look at the plans to let Go Ape rake in the money from Pollok Park, while us mugs pay for the car parks and toilets etc for their customers.
Regardless how much money is spent on recyling facilities,it will make little difference as long as so many Glaswegians are not prepared to use the facilities.
Posted by: J brown, Paisley on 7:42pm Thu 29 May 08
What is happening to all the firms that are getting grants to supposeadly recycle our rubbish, they are costing us a fortune, will we no longer require them, if so then I am all for spending £135 million.
What is happening to all the firms that are getting grants to supposeadly recycle our rubbish, they are costing us a fortune, will we no longer require them, if so then I am all for spending £135 million.
Posted by: d1888cfc, glasgow on 9:33pm Thu 29 May 08
run by private company, soon councils will be extinct and then watch how much it costs instead of coucil tax you'll pay private companys for everything.
run by private company, soon councils will be extinct and then watch how much it costs instead of coucil tax you'll pay private companys for everything.
Posted by: I Predict A Riot, Glasgow on 12:47am Fri 30 May 08
As reported in the Evening Times on Tuesday, Glasgow languishes at the bottom of the recycling table, only managing to reuse 17.9% of waste.
That may be so but I should imagine that we are at the top of the roads falling apart league,and deffo at the top of the road hump spring breakers league:-(
As reported in the Evening Times on Tuesday, Glasgow languishes at the bottom of the recycling table, only managing to reuse 17.9% of waste.
That may be so but I should imagine that we are at the top of the roads falling apart league,and deffo at the top of the road hump spring breakers league:-(
Posted by: Pat Gallagher, Pollokshields on 7:17am Fri 30 May 08
135 million for recycling.....one of the greenest cities.........what a joke. We cant even keep our streets free of litter. Glasgow is an open air dustbin.........
135 million for recycling.....one of the greenest cities.........what a joke. We cant even keep our streets free of litter. Glasgow is an open air dustbin.........
Posted by: People Power, Glasgow on 5:31pm Fri 30 May 08
[quote][bold]Sydney Meriwether[/bold] wrote:
If it wasn't about the future prosperity of our great city, then you would have to laugh at the [bold]retroactive incompetence[/bold] of the decrepit New Labour controlled Glasgow City Council 'administration'. On Tuesday the ET publishes an article detailing the lengthy failings of GCC in waste management... then on Thursday we've got the "it wisnae us, it wiz a big boy and he ran away" story from people who are supposed to lead this city. [bold]Wit a bunch a nyaffs![/bold][/quote]
Can the E.T. not make up their minds, or are the Council giving them signals that they'll pull their advertising contract if they don't get contradictory and positive light stories.
People are not that stupid they don't forget the story run just days before of Glasgow having the worst recycling record in Scotland.
Never mind Robert Booths spin and false promises, he for me is no better than Purcell.
Afterall he was shouted down at the "Go Ape" Public Meeting on January the 23rd.
When only seven of the 550 people in the room were in favour of Go Ape's proposal.
But even after the vote, Mr Booth said he remained confident that the course would be proven to be popular.
So, this man is not to be trusted, and people will see through his empty promises.
The answer here is not in the newspaper stories quoting Robert Booth, and Land & Environmental services, it is in seeing real results on the ground, rises in recycling levels, and satisfied members of the public.
Time will tell, but my feeling is Robert Booth like so many council officials will be left red faced, and eating their words, as they try to salvage what is left of their careers ( should they be lucky enough to be voted back in.)
Sydney Meriwether wrote:
If it wasn't about the future prosperity of our great city, then you would have to laugh at the retroactive incompetence of the decrepit New Labour controlled Glasgow City Council 'administration'. On Tuesday the ET publishes an article detailing the lengthy failings of GCC in waste management... then on Thursday we've got the "it wisnae us, it wiz a big boy and he ran away" story from people who are supposed to lead this city. Wit a bunch a nyaffs!
Can the E.T. not make up their minds, or are the Council giving them signals that they'll pull their advertising contract if they don't get contradictory and positive light stories.
People are not that stupid they don't forget the story run just days before of Glasgow having the worst recycling record in Scotland.
Never mind Robert Booths spin and false promises, he for me is no better than Purcell.
Afterall he was shouted down at the "Go Ape" Public Meeting on January the 23rd.
When only seven of the 550 people in the room were in favour of Go Ape's proposal.
But even after the vote, Mr Booth said he remained confident that the course would be proven to be popular.
So, this man is not to be trusted, and people will see through his empty promises.
The answer here is not in the newspaper stories quoting Robert Booth, and Land & Environmental services, it is in seeing real results on the ground, rises in recycling levels, and satisfied members of the public.
Time will tell, but my feeling is Robert Booth like so many council officials will be left red faced, and eating their words, as they try to salvage what is left of their careers ( should they be lucky enough to be voted back in.)