Evening Times: click here to return to our homepage
£600m wind of change
 
The new Clyde windfarm will be built on either side of the M74 at Abington
The new Clyde windfarm will be built on either side of the M74 at Abington
 
How the Cathkin Braes skyline will look
How the Cathkin Braes skyline will look
 
Whitelee near Eaglesham will one of the country's biggest windfarms
Whitelee near Eaglesham will one of the country's biggest windfarms
 
 

by Iain Lundy

THE go-ahead for Europe's largest onshore windfarm to be built in South Lanarkshire is a clear sign the Scottish Government wants to take its green responsibilities seriously.

Yesterday's announcement endorsing the plan for 152 turbines near Abington in Lanarkshire is the latest such project to be given the green light since the SNP took office last year.

WINDFARMS are springing up throughout the West of Scotland.

The Whitelee development on Eaglesham Moor is currently the biggest onshore windfarm under construction in the UK.

Reader Poll
More wind turbines are to be built. Critics say they are inefficient eyesores. Are windfarms a good investment?
Yes
71.7%
No
25.4%
Don't know
2.9%

But if Glasgow City Council has its way, the city will be the first in the UK to produce its own power.

It wants to build five turbines - each the size of the Glasgow Science Centre tower - on Cathkin Braes on the edge of the city.

Council chiefs say the move would create enough power to pay for all the city's street lights and would pay for itself within six years.

The Hagshaw Hill windfarm near Douglas, South Lanarkshire, was the first to be approved in Scotland. It was commissioned in 1995 and consists of 26 turbines.

A 12-turbine development is operated by Airtricity on land between Ardrossan and West Kilbride in North Ayrshire, producing electricity for 20,000 homes.

Six turbines were built in 2001 at Wardlaw Wood, near Dalry, by Dalry Community Windfarm. They produce a maximum of 18mw of clean electricity.

Hare Hill wind farm near new Cumnock consists of 20 turbines.

And 42 turbines have been built on the site of a former opencast mine at Black Law, near Forth, South Lanarkshire.

If campaigners have their way, Glasgow will soon be effectively ringed' by a series of windfarms.

One planned development at Cathkin Braes, to the south of the city, could power all the city's street and traffic lights saving the council millions of pounds a year.

But even within the country's environmental movement, reaction to the granting of more windfarm developments has been mixed.

The £600million Clyde windfarm near Abington, as reported in later editions of last night's Evening Times, is expected to create 200 construction jobs and 30 full-time jobs. It will be capable of providing electricity to more than 300,000 homes.

But despite First Minister Alex Salmond's claim that this will help make Scotland the green energy capital of Europe', many remain sceptical.

Gillian Bishop, of the campaign group Views of Scotland, believes the growing number of turbines will have a serious negative impact on the country's scenery and landscape.

She said of the Abington project: "It is on the main drive up from England and locals don't want tourists to be con- fronted by dozens of turbines.

"There is also concern that there are a lot of other appli- cations in for nearby areas.

"If the windfarms are built and they affect tourism badly then it's too late and peace and quiet and scenery is one of the few things Scotland has nowadays."

Mr Salmond, speaking ahead of his visit to the World Renewable Energy Congress being held this week at the SECC in Glasgow, said the Scottish Government has an ambitious target to generate 31% of Scotland's electricity demand from renewable sources by 2011 and 50% by 2020.

He was backed by environmental groups.

Dr Doug Parr, Greenpeace chief scientist, said: "Scotland has a key role to play in devel- oping renewable energy and in tackling climate change.

"This announcement is good news on both of these fronts and the windfarm should create many green-collar jobs. Hopefully, this will be only one of many such announcements."

And WWF Scotland Director, Dr Richard Dixon, said: "The Clyde windfarm is a good proposal as it is close to major centres of population - who will use the power it generates - and away from Scotland's most valuable landscapes.

"Scotland needs more of this sort of large, Central Belt windfarm to help us move quickly to clean, green energy."

The Clyde windfarm will be built "in clusters" on each side of the M74, creating capacity of 548 megawatts.

It will be larger than the Whitelee Farm currently being built by ScottishPower on Eaglesham Moor a project which some East End residents have accused of interfering with their television signal.

Once complete Whitelee will have 140 turbines which will be visible to 1.5million people every day.

ScottishPower is spending several million pounds on a visitor centre there and it insists that the site will still be a draw for ramblers, mountain bikers and birdwatchers.

Each of the Whitelee turbines are 200ft high and 300ft to the tip of the blade.

They are being transported across moorland - known as one of Scotland's "wilderness" areas - on which more than 90km of roads have been laid and bridges built.

ScottishPower said the project will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 650,000 tonnes a year, the equivalent to the output of 240,000 cars.

But Gillian Bishop, who lives in the shadow of the Whitelee development, said there is a growing need to balance alternative energy with the preservation of Scotland's scenic beauty.

Publication date 22/07/08

Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 11:07am Tue 22 Jul 08
Maybe it can power a light rail system for Glasgow eh!
Posted by: Pete, Glasgow on 11:32am Tue 22 Jul 08
Would Ms Bishop prefer a view of a new power station?

This would be the biggest windfarm in Europe, Whitlee possibly second or thereabouts. A solid committment to developing green energy sources. Good.
Posted by: Seymour Hope, Glasgow on 12:38pm Tue 22 Jul 08
We still need nuclear or an alternative to support renwables.
Posted by: hugo, south side on 12:58pm Tue 22 Jul 08
I am delighted that the wind farm has been announced, The sooner we embrace renewable energy sources the better.

As for nuclear power, will sorry, its to costly, dangerous and the long term implications are not good. I am sure if the same amount of money to build a nuclear plant was spent on renewable sources we would get a similar, if not better output, without the legacy problems of nuclear
Posted by: hugo, south side on 12:59pm Tue 22 Jul 08
I am delighted that the wind farm has been announced, The sooner we embrace renewable energy sources the better.

As for nuclear power, will sorry, its to costly, dangerous and the long term implications are not good. I am sure if the same amount of money to build a nuclear plant was spent on renewable sources we would get a similar, if not better output, without the legacy problems of nuclear
Posted by: Alan Wishart, Glasgow on 1:22pm Tue 22 Jul 08
The Reader Poll is meaningless.
Windfarms like this in the central belt are a great idea - those in the most scenic areas where tourism will be hit are not.
Posted by: Southside, Giffnock on 2:29pm Tue 22 Jul 08
Windfarms are terrible. They are not a reliable form of energy.

Nuclear is the way forward, until an alternative green form of electricity can be produced which is availabe at the switch of a button.
Posted by: witterquick, Glasgow on 2:34pm Tue 22 Jul 08
Southside, who's to say they're to be relied upon 100% of the time? If they add X amount of energy to the grid, then that's X amount of energy that doesn't need to be supplied to the grid by other less harmful means (although I am 100% behind nuclear).
Posted by: witterquick, Glasgow on 2:37pm Tue 22 Jul 08
More harmful. More! Darrrhgh
Posted by: Asturias, Glasgow on 2:51pm Tue 22 Jul 08
They are hiddeous.A real blot on the landscape.
How long is it before the Campsies and the Kilpatricks are wrecked ? Windfarms do not provide base load and are all about politicians looking good and giving the impression that something is being done.
Posted by: John Kebab, Glasgow on 3:21pm Tue 22 Jul 08
Why don't they try and make the turbine shafts out of glass and the blades out of clear perspex? They might blend in a bit better....just a thought....
Posted by: Pete, Glasgow on 4:30pm Tue 22 Jul 08
Mr Kebab, do you not think though that the fact they're big visible white things is kind of handy in a not-being-hit-by-pla
nes sense?
Posted by: jrb, Glasgow on 4:53pm Tue 22 Jul 08
We are now fully committed to the lie of global warming, and this monstrosity is only the first of many planned thousands all over Scotland.The bottom line is it will only increase fuel bills not lower them,just watch how they rocket in the coming years,all in aid of the big Con.
Posted by: Brad on 5:11pm Tue 22 Jul 08
the lie of global warming


If it's a lie, why do so many scientists, governments and the press seem to be believe it?
Posted by: jrb, Glasgow on 5:22pm Tue 22 Jul 08
Brad wrote:
the lie of global warming
If it's a lie, why do so many scientists, governments and the press seem to be believe it?
Yeah, you mean government scientists of course!.
Posted by: broxibear51, alexandria,scotland on 5:30pm Tue 22 Jul 08
I agree with you jrb, global warming is a con, if you look bck at history you will see that the world heats up and then cools down and this will happen again, it is just another way to get money from people in so called taxes.
Posted by: scotgod, glasgow on 6:23pm Tue 22 Jul 08
broxibear51 wrote:
I agree with you jrb, global warming is a con, if you look bck at history you will see that the world heats up and then cools down and this will happen again, it is just another way to get money from people in so called taxes.
who cares about future generation anyway, as long as we ok for another 60 years ill be happy
Posted by: scotgod, glasgow on 6:24pm Tue 22 Jul 08
while I am at it the quicker pandas become extinct the better
Posted by: puskas, East Kilbride on 7:05pm Tue 22 Jul 08
The massive problem with nuclear is the spent fuel.
Also the hidden danger of different forms of cancers'.
The Scottish Government is on the right road in advancing other forms of producing energy.

The reprocessing plant at Sellafield, Cumbria is a death trap for not only the localised area but straight up the West Coast of Scotland and into Scandinavia. Oh! I forgot to mention the Republic Of Ireland.
I worked their in 1990/1 in an office of 22 foreman and engineers. When I retired in 1996 with health problems 7 of my mates had died of cancer. Bowel, Bladder, Prostrate. I fear others have gone the same way since I retired and lost touch.
Present day the UK government have still to decide where to store the spent fuel..
Now the scientist inform us that spent fuel will remain active for 1,000+ years.
I personally do not wish to leave this legacy to future generations..
Some with a more selfish disposition may not bother leaving a major problem for our future generations.
Posted by: Edna Bucket, Interweb on 7:19pm Tue 22 Jul 08
i made a yahoo group to get to know and gab to et commenters, no profits or gains to ma sel just everyone who posts here welcome, as there is no facility here to get to know each other

http://groups.yahoo.
com/group/eveningtim
esgang
Posted by: John Kebab, Glasgow on 10:06am Wed 23 Jul 08
Mr Kebab, do you not think though that the fact they're big visible white things is kind of handy in a not-being-hit-by-pla

nes sense?


Yes, thats a good point. Ok, I would further suggest that the airline industry stipulate that all planes must be fitted with a see through glass wind turbine collision avoidance system. Or STGWTCAS for short.
Posted by: 2for1, Glasgow on 10:42am Wed 23 Jul 08
Brad wrote:
the lie of global warming


If it's a lie, why do so many scientists, governments and the press seem to be believe it?
Well,

I was on a trans-atlantic flight in the middle of June and whilst in the flight deck, the captain was showing me a huge ice 'shelf' stretching for about 10 or more miles off the coast of Greenland which we could hear some Air Canada pilots talking about on the radio... apparantly it is highly unusual for so much ice to be in that location at this time of the year! As was mentioned before (and as any stadard grade geography student could tell you!), the earth's temperature does periodically fluctuate, and yes we do need to clean up our act, but global warming is just another excuse to tax us more... after all, got an illegal war to pay for!
Posted by: John Kebab, Glasgow on 11:09am Wed 23 Jul 08
Well,

I was on a trans-atlantic flight in the middle of June and whilst in the flight deck, the captain was showing me a huge ice 'shelf' stretching for about 10 or more miles off the coast of Greenland which we could hear some Air Canada pilots talking about on the radio... apparantly it is highly unusual for so much ice to be in that location at this time of the year! As was mentioned before (and as any stadard grade geography student could tell you!), the earth's temperature does periodically fluctuate, and yes we do need to clean up our act, but global warming is just another excuse to tax us more... after all, got an illegal war to pay for!


I hope the pilot had his STGWTCAS switched on while you were chatting...
Posted by: 2for1, Glasgow on 11:57am Wed 23 Jul 08
John Kebab wrote:
Well,

I was on a trans-atlantic flight in the middle of June and whilst in the flight deck, the captain was showing me a huge ice 'shelf' stretching for about 10 or more miles off the coast of Greenland which we could hear some Air Canada pilots talking about on the radio... apparantly it is highly unusual for so much ice to be in that location at this time of the year! As was mentioned before (and as any stadard grade geography student could tell you!), the earth's temperature does periodically fluctuate, and yes we do need to clean up our act, but global warming is just another excuse to tax us more... after all, got an illegal war to pay for!


I hope the pilot had his STGWTCAS switched on while you were chatting...
It's the first thing they switch on before they even start the engines! :D
Posted by: Gazetteer, Glasgow on 1:21pm Wed 23 Jul 08
WWF Scotland Director Dr Richard Dixon is quoted as saying that: "The Clyde windfarm is a good proposal as it is close to major centres of population - who will use the power it generates - and away from Scotland's most valuable landscapes.

"Scotland needs more of this sort of large, Central Belt windfarm to help us move quickly to clean, green energy."

May I point out that the site is neither near a large centre of population nor in the Central Belt. The nearest town is Moffat, not Glasgow. and the site is on the northern fringe of the Southern Uplands. One is used to "environmentalists" being technically illiterate (they peddle the illusion that wind power can replace nuclear power, for example - it can't) but this is a first.
Posted by: emma, Glasgow on 7:28pm Wed 23 Jul 08
Wind turbines are quite pretty, think of them as size zero windmills :) Better than a nuclear power station or a coalface!
Posted by: marshall conklin, New Jersey, USA on 6:34am Thu 24 Jul 08
Wind turbines are much more attractive than telephone poles strung all over with wires.
Here in NJ there is some lovely landscape spoiled by all the wires and poles!!!!
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Car Hire
Copyright © 2009 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use