Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 11:12am Thu 21 Aug 08
No doubt this move will be seen in Manchester as an opportunity to punish Glasgow for the UEFA Cup invasion!
[italic]Charlie Gordon for Scottish New Labour leader... please![/italic]
--
Sydney Meriwether
[italic]"The voice of Glasgow's silenced majority."[/italic]
No doubt this move will be seen in Manchester as an opportunity to punish Glasgow for the UEFA Cup invasion!
Charlie Gordon for Scottish New Labour leader... please!
--
Sydney Meriwether
"The voice of Glasgow's silenced majority." Posted by: Stewie Griffin, Glasgow on 11:36am Thu 21 Aug 08
[quote]MANCHESTER Airport bosses today confirmed they are actively considering a bid to take over the BAA-run Glasgow Airport[/quote]
Good, because Glasgow Airport couldn't get any worse. The amount of flights from Glasgow to destinations abroad is pathetic. And as for killing of "Glasgow" Prestwick, by all means go ahead.
MANCHESTER Airport bosses today confirmed they are actively considering a bid to take over the BAA-run Glasgow Airport
Good, because Glasgow Airport couldn't get any worse. The amount of flights from Glasgow to destinations abroad is pathetic. And as for killing of "Glasgow" Prestwick, by all means go ahead.
Posted by: Hoof Hearted, GlasVegas on 11:36am Thu 21 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Sydney Meriwether[/bold] wrote:
No doubt this move will be seen in Manchester as an opportunity to punish Glasgow for the UEFA Cup invasion! [italic]Charlie Gordon for Scottish New Labour leader... please![/italic] -- Sydney Meriwether [italic]"The voice of Glasgow's silenced majority."[/italic] [/quote] Thats right Syd, bosses at Manchester are prepared to throw millions upon millions of their money into a project and ensure that it goes t*ts up just to punish Glasgow for one half of the old firm.
You are so insightful and have folied their plan. They'll be sitting down south complaining about how they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for that pesky sydney meriwether. Enjoy your scooby snack, you've deserved it.
Sydney Meriwether wrote:
No doubt this move will be seen in Manchester as an opportunity to punish Glasgow for the UEFA Cup invasion! Charlie Gordon for Scottish New Labour leader... please! -- Sydney Meriwether "The voice of Glasgow's silenced majority."
Thats right Syd, bosses at Manchester are prepared to throw millions upon millions of their money into a project and ensure that it goes t*ts up just to punish Glasgow for one half of the old firm.
You are so insightful and have folied their plan. They'll be sitting down south complaining about how they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for that pesky sydney meriwether. Enjoy your scooby snack, you've deserved it.
Posted by: Dredd, glasgow on 11:38am Thu 21 Aug 08
Quote - "We know the people who run Glasgow Airport and the staff and they are fantastically committed."
I know the staff are loyal and very committed, the issue is how loyal and committed is he to them ?
This is the same company that has slashed wages and to quote a union official in the 2000 industial action "Industrial relations are at an all-time low".
The loyal staff at Glasgow have served the public well (even if those in charge have not) they deserve a respected employer who will offer secure long term employment and not some more money grabbing share holders, in to asset strip the Airport and pay the minimum wage to those who serve and protect the public, without long term negotiated guarantees on pay and conditions if sold, the Airport could be entering a long period of poor relations, have a search of the Manchester Evening news, where you will find many stories of slashed wages and strike action.
http://www.mancheste
reveningnews.co.uk/n
ews/s/41/41385_strik
e_ballot_threat_to_a
irport.html
I hope all those crying out for the sale will not be left with egg on their faces, if the Airport is sold and future investment dries up.
I appreciate that the public wants clean Airports, cheaper flights and more routes from Scotland (we all do) but we must ensure that the safety and security of the Airport is not compromised, by cutting back on staff, training, equipment and salary's.
Quote - "We know the people who run Glasgow Airport and the staff and they are fantastically committed."
I know the staff are loyal and very committed, the issue is how loyal and committed is he to them ?
This is the same company that has slashed wages and to quote a union official in the 2000 industial action "Industrial relations are at an all-time low".
The loyal staff at Glasgow have served the public well (even if those in charge have not) they deserve a respected employer who will offer secure long term employment and not some more money grabbing share holders, in to asset strip the Airport and pay the minimum wage to those who serve and protect the public, without long term negotiated guarantees on pay and conditions if sold, the Airport could be entering a long period of poor relations, have a search of the Manchester Evening news, where you will find many stories of slashed wages and strike action.
http://www.mancheste
reveningnews.co.uk/n
ews/s/41/41385_strik
e_ballot_threat_to_a
irport.html
I hope all those crying out for the sale will not be left with egg on their faces, if the Airport is sold and future investment dries up.
I appreciate that the public wants clean Airports, cheaper flights and more routes from Scotland (we all do) but we must ensure that the safety and security of the Airport is not compromised, by cutting back on staff, training, equipment and salary's.
Posted by: Hoof Hearted, GlasVegas on 11:38am Thu 21 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Stewie Griffin[/bold] wrote:
[quote]MANCHESTER Airport bosses today confirmed they are actively considering a bid to take over the BAA-run Glasgow Airport[/quote] Good, because Glasgow Airport couldn't get any worse. The amount of flights from Glasgow to destinations abroad is pathetic. And as for killing of "Glasgow" Prestwick, by all means go ahead. [/quote] Glasgow airport couldn't get any worse????
It could............. the council could buy it back and then council employees get to run it!!!
STRIKE !!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Stewie Griffin wrote:
MANCHESTER Airport bosses today confirmed they are actively considering a bid to take over the BAA-run Glasgow Airport
Good, because Glasgow Airport couldn't get any worse. The amount of flights from Glasgow to destinations abroad is pathetic. And as for killing of "Glasgow" Prestwick, by all means go ahead.
Glasgow airport couldn't get any worse????
It could............. the council could buy it back and then council employees get to run it!!!
STRIKE !!!!!!!!!!!! :)
Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 11:52am Thu 21 Aug 08
Manchester has its own jobcentre it employs so many people.I see Glasgow overtook Edinburgh in july .Why not .
Manchester has its own jobcentre it employs so many people.I see Glasgow overtook Edinburgh in july .Why not .
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 12:06pm Thu 21 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Dredd[/bold] wrote:
Quote - "We know the people who run Glasgow Airport and the staff and they are fantastically committed." I know the staff are loyal and very committed, the issue is how loyal and committed is he to them ? This is the same company that has slashed wages and to quote a union official in the 2000 industial action "Industrial relations are at an all-time low". The loyal staff at Glasgow have served the public well (even if those in charge have not) they deserve a respected employer who will offer secure long term employment and not some more money grabbing share holders, in to asset strip the Airport and pay the minimum wage to those who serve and protect the public, without long term negotiated guarantees on pay and conditions if sold, the Airport could be entering a long period of poor relations, have a search of the Manchester Evening news, where you will find many stories of slashed wages and strike action. http://www.mancheste reveningnews.co.uk/n ews/s/41/41385_strik e_ballot_threat_to_a irport.html I hope all those crying out for the sale will not be left with egg on their faces, if the Airport is sold and future investment dries up. I appreciate that the public wants clean Airports, cheaper flights and more routes from Scotland (we all do) but we must ensure that the safety and security of the Airport is not compromised, by cutting back on staff, training, equipment and salary's.[/quote] you must be one of the rich ones who fly business class well the economy out number you ten to one roll on the cheap fares and that cairns in the chamber of commerce has probably never paid for a flight in his life so he would defend BAA the robbing baskets roll on 2009 tae a get a holiday in the sun
Dredd wrote:
Quote - "We know the people who run Glasgow Airport and the staff and they are fantastically committed." I know the staff are loyal and very committed, the issue is how loyal and committed is he to them ? This is the same company that has slashed wages and to quote a union official in the 2000 industial action "Industrial relations are at an all-time low". The loyal staff at Glasgow have served the public well (even if those in charge have not) they deserve a respected employer who will offer secure long term employment and not some more money grabbing share holders, in to asset strip the Airport and pay the minimum wage to those who serve and protect the public, without long term negotiated guarantees on pay and conditions if sold, the Airport could be entering a long period of poor relations, have a search of the Manchester Evening news, where you will find many stories of slashed wages and strike action. http://www.mancheste reveningnews.co.uk/n ews/s/41/41385_strik e_ballot_threat_to_a irport.html I hope all those crying out for the sale will not be left with egg on their faces, if the Airport is sold and future investment dries up. I appreciate that the public wants clean Airports, cheaper flights and more routes from Scotland (we all do) but we must ensure that the safety and security of the Airport is not compromised, by cutting back on staff, training, equipment and salary's.
you must be one of the rich ones who fly business class well the economy out number you ten to one roll on the cheap fares and that cairns in the chamber of commerce has probably never paid for a flight in his life so he would defend BAA the robbing baskets roll on 2009 tae a get a holiday in the sun
Posted by: alan, Glasgow on 12:09pm Thu 21 Aug 08
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports."
Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and
Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal.
Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester.
Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links.
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports."
Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and
Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal.
Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester.
Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links.
Posted by: alan, Glasgow on 12:11pm Thu 21 Aug 08
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports."
Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and moving business down to Manchester
Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal.
Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester.
Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links.
(sorry part of text got deleted there)
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports."
Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and moving business down to Manchester
Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal.
Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester.
Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links.
(sorry part of text got deleted there)
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 12:21pm Thu 21 Aug 08
[quote][bold]alan[/bold] wrote:
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports." Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and moving business down to Manchester Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal. Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester. Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links. (sorry part of text got deleted there)[/quote] is glasgow not a low cost hub with a few transatlantic flights in the summer its full of charters and ba only fly you to london for you to change flights a dont know where they get there 193 routes from because there certainly not direct globespan have more direct routes than BA
alan wrote:
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports." Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and moving business down to Manchester Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal. Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester. Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links. (sorry part of text got deleted there)
is glasgow not a low cost hub with a few transatlantic flights in the summer its full of charters and ba only fly you to london for you to change flights a dont know where they get there 193 routes from because there certainly not direct globespan have more direct routes than BA
Posted by: Rob O, UK on 12:38pm Thu 21 Aug 08
If MAG wish to buy Glasgow or Edinburgh are we not in danger of just moving the monopoly from one company to another? As for building another airport from scratch who is going to foot the bill forthat one. To build an international airport from scratch would cost many billions!!
If MAG wish to buy Glasgow or Edinburgh are we not in danger of just moving the monopoly from one company to another? As for building another airport from scratch who is going to foot the bill forthat one. To build an international airport from scratch would cost many billions!!
Posted by: bannatyne, Glasgow on 12:47pm Thu 21 Aug 08
to be honest i don't care who owns it. As long as we get more direct routes. For example flying to Oslo and countless others you have to fly to Heathrow, Manchester, Amsterdam or Paris. Then come all the way back up again. How stupid is that!!! Carbon footprint is huge
to be honest i don't care who owns it. As long as we get more direct routes. For example flying to Oslo and countless others you have to fly to Heathrow, Manchester, Amsterdam or Paris. Then come all the way back up again. How stupid is that!!! Carbon footprint is huge
Posted by: bannatyne, Glasgow on 12:50pm Thu 21 Aug 08
I don't care who owns it just as long as we get more routes. For example flying to Oslo and many other places you either have to fly to a London Airport or Amsterdam or Paris to come all the way back up again. How stupid is that? Carbon footprint is huge
I don't care who owns it just as long as we get more routes. For example flying to Oslo and many other places you either have to fly to a London Airport or Amsterdam or Paris to come all the way back up again. How stupid is that? Carbon footprint is huge
Posted by: weewilliewinky, paisley on 12:56pm Thu 21 Aug 08
Prestwick have just lost their two main freght carriers which account for over 20% of their income , when Glasgow is sold it will sound the death knell of Prestwick , their is also a lot of seriously worried managers at Gla who have been promoted recently not through ability but by being lackies , role on the takeover it il be the best thing to happen to this airport and the sooner all the rotten apples are thrown out the barrel the better
Prestwick have just lost their two main freght carriers which account for over 20% of their income , when Glasgow is sold it will sound the death knell of Prestwick , their is also a lot of seriously worried managers at Gla who have been promoted recently not through ability but by being lackies , role on the takeover it il be the best thing to happen to this airport and the sooner all the rotten apples are thrown out the barrel the better
Posted by: Mark Pittman, Glasgow on 2:13pm Thu 21 Aug 08
This is good news. I wonder if Peel Ports will also make a bid for Glasgow Aiport.
This is good news. I wonder if Peel Ports will also make a bid for Glasgow Aiport.
Posted by: butterfly-y, perth on 2:43pm Thu 21 Aug 08
Oh what a wonderful idea - let Manchester Airport buy Glasgow Airport and then the management - which will be in Manchester of course - can take away all the flights from Glasgow to anywhere and everywhere except maybe Barra and we will all have to travel to Manchester to fly anywhere goody,goody.
Oh what a wonderful idea - let Manchester Airport buy Glasgow Airport and then the management - which will be in Manchester of course - can take away all the flights from Glasgow to anywhere and everywhere except maybe Barra and we will all have to travel to Manchester to fly anywhere goody,goody.
Posted by: emma, Glasgow on 3:47pm Thu 21 Aug 08
[quote][bold]alan[/bold] wrote:
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports."
Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and moving business down to Manchester
Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal.
Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester.
Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links.
(sorry part of text got deleted there)[/quote] Bus and Rail links good to Cumbernauld???? Well I suppose it is better than getting to Glasgow Airport by rail. Where would the airport be sited to be near the rail link? On the green belt? Glasgow Airport needs a good shake up, its a kid on airport. Although MAG's Bournemouth Airport is a joke, it really is a portacabin.
alan wrote:
Quote: "The Manchester group also operates East Midlands, Bournemouth and Humberside Airports."
Whats to stop MAG from asset stripping Glasgow Airport and moving business down to Manchester
Humberside airports main business is from the Charter Market, East Midlands Airport is now predominently a hub for Low Cost Airlines and Charter Airlines. Manchester Airport however has all the juicy business, with 22,122,625 (approx) passengers in 2007, and manchester airport also being the world freight terminal.
Glasgow Airport may have its long haul flights diverted to Manchester, and having Glasgow downgraded to a low cost hub, with shuttles down to manchester.
Best thing to do is close Glasgow Airport AND Edinburgh Airport and relocate it to a central location accessible to everyone - say Cumbernauld for example. Excellent road links, excellent bus links, and rail links, no need to spent taxpayers money on airport rail links and tram links.
(sorry part of text got deleted there)
Bus and Rail links good to Cumbernauld???? Well I suppose it is better than getting to Glasgow Airport by rail. Where would the airport be sited to be near the rail link? On the green belt? Glasgow Airport needs a good shake up, its a kid on airport. Although MAG's Bournemouth Airport is a joke, it really is a portacabin.
Posted by: Foxhound, W.o.Scotland on 4:06pm Thu 21 Aug 08
[quote][bold]butterfly-y[/bold] wrote:
Oh what a wonderful idea - let Manchester Airport buy Glasgow Airport and then the management - which will be in Manchester of course - can take away all the flights from Glasgow to anywhere and everywhere except maybe Barra and we will all have to travel to Manchester to fly anywhere goody,goody.[/quote] No danger of that happening! Glasgow can only improve under different management and unshackled from Edinburghs coat tales !
butterfly-y wrote:
Oh what a wonderful idea - let Manchester Airport buy Glasgow Airport and then the management - which will be in Manchester of course - can take away all the flights from Glasgow to anywhere and everywhere except maybe Barra and we will all have to travel to Manchester to fly anywhere goody,goody.
No danger of that happening! Glasgow can only improve under different management and unshackled from Edinburghs coat tales !
Posted by: Brad on 4:08pm Thu 21 Aug 08
Difficult to see why MAG would not want to make a good job of running GLA: it's in their interests to do so. You can't really transfer the business to Manchester, most people wouldn't go there. But for GLA to well, it'll have to compete with EDI and PIK, which should lead to a better service.
BAA's nonsense about different markets... well of course they don't compete - BAA doesn't want them to! They want them to both to funnel lots of people to their LDN airports for more landing charges and retail spend. Good for BAA; bad for Scotland.
Difficult to see why MAG would not want to make a good job of running GLA: it's in their interests to do so. You can't really transfer the business to Manchester, most people wouldn't go there. But for GLA to well, it'll have to compete with EDI and PIK, which should lead to a better service.
BAA's nonsense about different markets... well of course they don't compete - BAA doesn't want them to! They want them to both to funnel lots of people to their LDN airports for more landing charges and retail spend. Good for BAA; bad for Scotland.
Posted by: Foxhound, W.o.Scotland on 5:37pm Thu 21 Aug 08
Prestwick's chief executive Mark Rodwell using Glasgow airport was a "dreadful experience" compared to its European counterparts!
Interesting that he uses Glasgow to fly to and from rather than his own "Pure Dead Brilliant" Airport which is looking rather exposed at the moment .A dreadful experience ! He should try flying from his own Airport when they have more than 4 flights to depart within the hour now that is dreadful !
Prestwick's chief executive Mark Rodwell using Glasgow airport was a "dreadful experience" compared to its European counterparts!
Interesting that he uses Glasgow to fly to and from rather than his own "Pure Dead Brilliant" Airport which is looking rather exposed at the moment .A dreadful experience ! He should try flying from his own Airport when they have more than 4 flights to depart within the hour now that is dreadful !
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 12:18am Sat 23 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Foxhound[/bold] wrote:
Prestwick's chief executive Mark Rodwell using Glasgow airport was a "dreadful experience" compared to its European counterparts! Interesting that he uses Glasgow to fly to and from rather than his own "Pure Dead Brilliant" Airport which is looking rather exposed at the moment .A dreadful experience ! He should try flying from his own Airport when they have more than 4 flights to depart within the hour now that is dreadful ! [/quote] you are a bam get into the real life cheap fares ya ****
Foxhound wrote:
Prestwick's chief executive Mark Rodwell using Glasgow airport was a "dreadful experience" compared to its European counterparts! Interesting that he uses Glasgow to fly to and from rather than his own "Pure Dead Brilliant" Airport which is looking rather exposed at the moment .A dreadful experience ! He should try flying from his own Airport when they have more than 4 flights to depart within the hour now that is dreadful !
you are a bam get into the real life cheap fares ya ****
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 1:01am Sat 23 Aug 08
[quote][bold]Foxhound[/bold] wrote:
Prestwick's chief executive Mark Rodwell using Glasgow airport was a "dreadful experience" compared to its European counterparts! Interesting that he uses Glasgow to fly to and from rather than his own "Pure Dead Brilliant" Airport which is looking rather exposed at the moment .A dreadful experience ! He should try flying from his own Airport when they have more than 4 flights to depart within the hour now that is dreadful ! [/quote] at last somebody has a constustive comment vic and his wee army of clowns shoukd take a leaf
Foxhound wrote:
Prestwick's chief executive Mark Rodwell using Glasgow airport was a "dreadful experience" compared to its European counterparts! Interesting that he uses Glasgow to fly to and from rather than his own "Pure Dead Brilliant" Airport which is looking rather exposed at the moment .A dreadful experience ! He should try flying from his own Airport when they have more than 4 flights to depart within the hour now that is dreadful !
at last somebody has a constustive comment vic and his wee army of clowns shoukd take a leaf
Posted by: iscozzese, Glasgow on 4:08pm Mon 25 Aug 08
Glasgow and Prestwick have two different market sectors all togheter.
BAA always favoured Edinburgh to Glasgow and so all the MP's, therefore maybe a growing company like MAG could improve Glasgow growt. I rathar fly via Manchester than via London with the sky high taxes and duties.
Glasgow and Prestwick have two different market sectors all togheter.
BAA always favoured Edinburgh to Glasgow and so all the MP's, therefore maybe a growing company like MAG could improve Glasgow growt. I rathar fly via Manchester than via London with the sky high taxes and duties.
Comment | Read Comments (23)
