Posted by: butterfly-y, perth on 11:03am Wed 3 Sep 08
How interesting - the monkeys at ET are allowing us to comment on the clown Purcell and his attempts to persuade us that liebour are doing the right thing by Glasgow and at the same time we are not allowed to comment on Alex Salmond and the SNP government's bills to be introduced in order to improve things for Scotland and all Scots. Well quelle surprise but of course ET you still managed to get a comment or five from the check out chick Jamieson - ET you are a rubbish liebour rag - always have been always will be.
How interesting - the monkeys at ET are allowing us to comment on the clown Purcell and his attempts to persuade us that liebour are doing the right thing by Glasgow and at the same time we are not allowed to comment on Alex Salmond and the SNP government's bills to be introduced in order to improve things for Scotland and all Scots. Well quelle surprise but of course ET you still managed to get a comment or five from the check out chick Jamieson - ET you are a rubbish liebour rag - always have been always will be.
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 11:19am Wed 3 Sep 08
Same old trash... New Labour mince that things are [italic]going[/italic] to change... jobs will come... tourists will come... social housing will come... these bungling monkeys have been in power in this city for 60 years and in that time Glasgow has went from a [bold]proud industrial powerhouse to an irrelevant wee nyaff of a city[/bold]... just like Purcell is an irrelevant wee nyaff of a man!
--
Sydney Meriwether
[italic]"One of Glasgow's more intelligent residents."[/italic]
Same old trash... New Labour mince that things are
going to change... jobs will come... tourists will come... social housing will come... these bungling monkeys have been in power in this city for 60 years and in that time Glasgow has went from a
proud industrial powerhouse to an irrelevant wee nyaff of a city... just like Purcell is an irrelevant wee nyaff of a man!
--
Sydney Meriwether
"One of Glasgow's more intelligent residents."
Posted by: glamkitty, Glasgow on 11:28am Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote][bold]butterfly-y[/bold] wrote:
How interesting - the monkeys at ET are allowing us to comment on the clown Purcell and his attempts to persuade us that liebour are doing the right thing by Glasgow and at the same time we are not allowed to comment on Alex Salmond and the SNP government's bills to be introduced in order to improve things for Scotland and all Scots. Well quelle surprise but of course ET you still managed to get a comment or five from the check out chick Jamieson - ET you are a rubbish liebour rag - always have been always will be.[/quote] Comical that you think anything the SNP suggests could improve Scotland!* They are the biggest joke (and embarrassment ) this country has seen in many a day.
*(and comical that the ET thinks labour could, either...)
butterfly-y wrote:
How interesting - the monkeys at ET are allowing us to comment on the clown Purcell and his attempts to persuade us that liebour are doing the right thing by Glasgow and at the same time we are not allowed to comment on Alex Salmond and the SNP government's bills to be introduced in order to improve things for Scotland and all Scots. Well quelle surprise but of course ET you still managed to get a comment or five from the check out chick Jamieson - ET you are a rubbish liebour rag - always have been always will be.
Comical that you think anything the SNP suggests could improve Scotland!* They are the biggest joke (and embarrassment ) this country has seen in many a day.
*(and comical that the ET thinks labour could, either...)
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 11:56am Wed 3 Sep 08
PURCELL SAYS,,,,,,,,Mr Purcell added: "We have an,less over the next few years, particularly with the Commonwealth Games coming, to secure apprenticeships for many more school leavers."
He said the 2014 Games would bring significant physical regeneration, increase tourism, job creation, and private and socially rented accommodation. The Athletes' Village, to be built in Dalmarnock, would be used for housing after the event.
And if the comenwealth games were not coming there would be less apprentices,less opportunity never mind the whopping bill were landed with.Then he says The Athletes' Village will be used for social housing my a8re they,ll sell it to the highest bidder no doubt one of the many cronies they except illegal back handers from PURCELL must be removed so he has no part in any games and as syd says they have.... social housing will come... these bungling monkeys have been in power in this city for 60 years and in that time Glasgow has went from a proud industrial powerhouse to an irrelevant wee nyaff of a city... the shipyards babcock to name a few used to take thousands of apprentices!!!!!! a know a was one and another thing it was a 4 year apprentice ship not these made up 2 year shots
PURCELL SAYS,,,,,,,,Mr Purcell added: "We have an,less over the next few years, particularly with the Commonwealth Games coming, to secure apprenticeships for many more school leavers."
He said the 2014 Games would bring significant physical regeneration, increase tourism, job creation, and private and socially rented accommodation. The Athletes' Village, to be built in Dalmarnock, would be used for housing after the event.
And if the comenwealth games were not coming there would be less apprentices,less opportunity never mind the whopping bill were landed with.Then he says The Athletes' Village will be used for social housing my a8re they,ll sell it to the highest bidder no doubt one of the many cronies they except illegal back handers from PURCELL must be removed so he has no part in any games and as syd says they have.... social housing will come... these bungling monkeys have been in power in this city for 60 years and in that time Glasgow has went from a proud industrial powerhouse to an irrelevant wee nyaff of a city... the shipyards babcock to name a few used to take thousands of apprentices!!!!!! a know a was one and another thing it was a 4 year apprentice ship not these made up 2 year shots
Posted by: iPhone ipost, Glasgow on 11:56am Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote][bold]glamkitty[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]butterfly-y[/bold] wrote:
How interesting - the monkeys at ET are allowing us to comment on the clown Purcell and his attempts to persuade us that liebour are doing the right thing by Glasgow and at the same time we are not allowed to comment on Alex Salmond and the SNP government's bills to be introduced in order to improve things for Scotland and all Scots. Well quelle surprise but of course ET you still managed to get a comment or five from the check out chick Jamieson - ET you are a rubbish liebour rag - always have been always will be.[/quote] Comical that you think anything the SNP suggests could improve Scotland!* They are the biggest joke (and embarrassment ) this country has seen in many a day.
*(and comical that the ET thinks labour could, either...)[/quote] I beg to differ, I think the SNP (not that i voted for them) are doing a reasonably good job. They could be doing better, but on the whole i think they have done a better job then labour would have done.
They have taken some bold decisions on Energy Policy and are working to improve the Health Service and more importantly they are listening to the public more than Labour ever did.
glamkitty wrote:
butterfly-y wrote:
How interesting - the monkeys at ET are allowing us to comment on the clown Purcell and his attempts to persuade us that liebour are doing the right thing by Glasgow and at the same time we are not allowed to comment on Alex Salmond and the SNP government's bills to be introduced in order to improve things for Scotland and all Scots. Well quelle surprise but of course ET you still managed to get a comment or five from the check out chick Jamieson - ET you are a rubbish liebour rag - always have been always will be.
Comical that you think anything the SNP suggests could improve Scotland!* They are the biggest joke (and embarrassment ) this country has seen in many a day.
*(and comical that the ET thinks labour could, either...)
I beg to differ, I think the SNP (not that i voted for them) are doing a reasonably good job. They could be doing better, but on the whole i think they have done a better job then labour would have done.
They have taken some bold decisions on Energy Policy and are working to improve the Health Service and more importantly they are listening to the public more than Labour ever did.
Posted by: Deeko, Glasgow on 12:18pm Wed 3 Sep 08
Council bashing aside, can people like Sydney, Fredo and Butterfly not just be happy for the young people who have worked hard to gain an apprecticeship? Which i can tell you is no easy task.
You will probably be the same people who come on here and complain that the Council isnt doing enough to encourage our young people to work, and will say the Council dont provide enough services.
Read the comments of the young people interviewed, they are delighted to be in employment and have some sort of secure plan for the future.
Instead of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.
Council bashing aside, can people like Sydney, Fredo and Butterfly not just be happy for the young people who have worked hard to gain an apprecticeship? Which i can tell you is no easy task.
You will probably be the same people who come on here and complain that the Council isnt doing enough to encourage our young people to work, and will say the Council dont provide enough services.
Read the comments of the young people interviewed, they are delighted to be in employment and have some sort of secure plan for the future.
Instead of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.
Posted by: victor meldrew, condorrat on 12:20pm Wed 3 Sep 08
C'mon Ev. Times, - Please stick to news and interest stories. Too much space given to being a P.R. organ for Glasgow City Council!
C'mon Ev. Times, - Please stick to news and interest stories. Too much space given to being a P.R. organ for Glasgow City Council!
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 12:24pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote][bold]Deeko[/bold] wrote:
Council bashing aside, can people like Sydney, Fredo and Butterfly not just be happy for the young people who have worked hard to gain an apprecticeship? Which i can tell you is no easy task. You will probably be the same people who come on here and complain that the Council isnt doing enough to encourage our young people to work, and will say the Council dont provide enough services. Read the comments of the young people interviewed, they are delighted to be in employment and have some sort of secure plan for the future. Instead of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.[/quote] I am delighted for the apprentices, but it,s no thanks to the headline loving council that they are getting jobs it,s because of a skills shortage when was the lasttime they started as many apprentices???
Deeko wrote:
Council bashing aside, can people like Sydney, Fredo and Butterfly not just be happy for the young people who have worked hard to gain an apprecticeship? Which i can tell you is no easy task. You will probably be the same people who come on here and complain that the Council isnt doing enough to encourage our young people to work, and will say the Council dont provide enough services. Read the comments of the young people interviewed, they are delighted to be in employment and have some sort of secure plan for the future. Instead of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.
I am delighted for the apprentices, but it,s no thanks to the headline loving council that they are getting jobs it,s because of a skills shortage when was the lasttime they started as many apprentices???
Posted by: subrosa on 12:40pm Wed 3 Sep 08
An apprenticeship should insist on at least an SVQ level 3. The SVQ level 2 is exceptionally basic.
Personally I think a City & Guilds qualification in any trade is far superior to any SVQ or NVQ certificate. These were brought in, around 20 years ago, to dumb down the levels required for your tradesmen.
Also the loss of so many excellent technical colleges hasn't helped. The new 'universities' aren't really interested in vocational skills and cannot attract the quality of staff required in these areas. Shame.
An apprenticeship should insist on at least an SVQ level 3. The SVQ level 2 is exceptionally basic.
Personally I think a City & Guilds qualification in any trade is far superior to any SVQ or NVQ certificate. These were brought in, around 20 years ago, to dumb down the levels required for your tradesmen.
Also the loss of so many excellent technical colleges hasn't helped. The new 'universities' aren't really interested in vocational skills and cannot attract the quality of staff required in these areas. Shame.
Posted by: subrosa on 12:45pm Wed 3 Sep 08
P[quote]osted by: Deeko, Glasgow on 12:18pm today
of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.[/quote]
Isn't it sad that we have to commend youngsters who are 'willing' to go out to work? It shouldn't be a case of being willing, it should be a case of necessity for them for many reasons.
Just shows how low we have dropped as a society. Time the benefits system was overhauled - take it back 40 years and youngsters will then hopefully realise, once they're able to drink and vote, then they're responsible enough to pay their own way within society.
P
osted by: Deeko, Glasgow on 12:18pm today
of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.
Isn't it sad that we have to commend youngsters who are 'willing' to go out to work? It shouldn't be a case of being willing, it should be a case of necessity for them for many reasons.
Just shows how low we have dropped as a society. Time the benefits system was overhauled - take it back 40 years and youngsters will then hopefully realise, once they're able to drink and vote, then they're responsible enough to pay their own way within society.
Posted by: Hoof Hearted, GlasVegas on 12:51pm Wed 3 Sep 08
Did Darren Mirren get an apprenticeship? Or could he not find the City Chambers? (Maybe the decsription of the big building in the toon wi' they two big lions ootside frightened him).
Did Darren Mirren get an apprenticeship? Or could he not find the City Chambers? (Maybe the decsription of the big building in the toon wi' they two big lions ootside frightened him).
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 1:03pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote][bold]subrosa[/bold] wrote:
P[quote]osted by: Deeko, Glasgow on 12:18pm today of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.[/quote] Isn't it sad that we have to commend youngsters who are 'willing' to go out to work? It shouldn't be a case of being willing, it should be a case of necessity for them for many reasons. Just shows how low we have dropped as a society. Time the benefits system was overhauled - take it back 40 years and youngsters will then hopefully realise, once they're able to drink and vote, then they're responsible enough to pay their own way within society.[/quote] Well said subrosa "deeko" has"nt got a clue when i was a scool leaver we had to get a job no lying about waiting on somebody taking you by the hand,wake up deeko son what age are you?????
subrosa wrote:
Posted by: Deeko, Glasgow on 12:18pm today of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.
Isn't it sad that we have to commend youngsters who are 'willing' to go out to work? It shouldn't be a case of being willing, it should be a case of necessity for them for many reasons. Just shows how low we have dropped as a society. Time the benefits system was overhauled - take it back 40 years and youngsters will then hopefully realise, once they're able to drink and vote, then they're responsible enough to pay their own way within society.
Well said subrosa "deeko" has"nt got a clue when i was a scool leaver we had to get a job no lying about waiting on somebody taking you by the hand,wake up deeko son what age are you?????
Posted by: leesome, Glasgow on 1:18pm Wed 3 Sep 08
Glasgow Council yet agian endanagering the young. Could those youths be taught proper health and safety. Just not prim & proper.
Glasgow Council yet agian endanagering the young. Could those youths be taught proper health and safety. Just not prim & proper.
Posted by: leesome, Glasgow on 1:19pm Wed 3 Sep 08
If that saw causes a injury, the boy is unlike to have any fingers, perish the thought if machinery were in use.
If that saw causes a injury, the boy is unlike to have any fingers, perish the thought if machinery were in use.
Posted by: Deeko, Glasgow on 1:34pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote]Well said subrosa "deeko" has"nt got a clue when i was a scool leaver we had to get a job no lying about waiting on somebody taking you by the hand,wake up deeko son what age are you?????[/quote]
I'm not quite sure what point you are trying to make here? It may be lost in all the punctuation and spelling mistakes.
But anyway, my cousin was one of the young school leavers who was actively looking for a joinery apprenticeship this spring/summer. He eventually got one, but from all the effort I saw he put into finding a placement in a slowing area of the economy, I felt that he should be commended.
To Subrosa, perhaps "willing" may have been the wrong word choice, but I still stand by my view.
Well said subrosa "deeko" has"nt got a clue when i was a scool leaver we had to get a job no lying about waiting on somebody taking you by the hand,wake up deeko son what age are you?????
I'm not quite sure what point you are trying to make here? It may be lost in all the punctuation and spelling mistakes.
But anyway, my cousin was one of the young school leavers who was actively looking for a joinery apprenticeship this spring/summer. He eventually got one, but from all the effort I saw he put into finding a placement in a slowing area of the economy, I felt that he should be commended.
To Subrosa, perhaps "willing" may have been the wrong word choice, but I still stand by my view.
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 2:10pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote][bold]fredo[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Deeko[/bold] wrote: Council bashing aside, can people like Sydney, Fredo and Butterfly not just be happy for the young people who have worked hard to gain an apprecticeship? Which i can tell you is no easy task. You will probably be the same people who come on here and complain that the Council isnt doing enough to encourage our young people to work, and will say the Council dont provide enough services. Read the comments of the young people interviewed, they are delighted to be in employment and have some sort of secure plan for the future. Instead of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.[/quote] I am delighted for the apprentices, but it,s no thanks to the headline loving council that they are getting jobs it,s because of a skills shortage when was the lasttime they started as many apprentices???[/quote] where are all the other unlucky one,s going to get apprentice ships because if i remember right there was something like 2000 applicants or more and don't tell me you know someone in the council is that why your cousin god bless him got started???and never mind the we spelling mistakes and punctuation we all do it so move on and tell the people who got your cousin the job deeko and read the comments properly
fredo wrote:
Deeko wrote: Council bashing aside, can people like Sydney, Fredo and Butterfly not just be happy for the young people who have worked hard to gain an apprecticeship? Which i can tell you is no easy task. You will probably be the same people who come on here and complain that the Council isnt doing enough to encourage our young people to work, and will say the Council dont provide enough services. Read the comments of the young people interviewed, they are delighted to be in employment and have some sort of secure plan for the future. Instead of using every excuse to be negative, why dont you give us all a break and and commend the pro-active youngsters who are willing to go out and work.
I am delighted for the apprentices, but it,s no thanks to the headline loving council that they are getting jobs it,s because of a skills shortage when was the lasttime they started as many apprentices???
where are all the other unlucky one,s going to get apprentice ships because if i remember right there was something like 2000 applicants or more and don't tell me you know someone in the council is that why your cousin god bless him got started???and never mind the we spelling mistakes and punctuation we all do it so move on and tell the people who got your cousin the job deeko and read the comments properly
Posted by: Hoof Hearted, GlasVegas on 2:16pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote]where are all the other unlucky one,s going to get apprentice ships [/quote]
Maybe try the Govan yard, although I think they are building war ships at the moment.
where are all the other unlucky one,s going to get apprentice ships
Maybe try the Govan yard, although I think they are building war ships at the moment.
Posted by: Deeko, Glasgow on 4:17pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote]and tell the people who got your cousin the job[/quote]
He got the job all by himself. You know that process where you apply for a job, get an interview, and then they give the position to the most suitable candidate.
Glad I could clear that up for you.
and tell the people who got your cousin the job
He got the job all by himself. You know that process where you apply for a job, get an interview, and then they give the position to the most suitable candidate.
Glad I could clear that up for you.
Posted by: Hoof Hearted, GlasVegas on 4:21pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote][bold]Deeko[/bold] wrote:
[quote]and tell the people who got your cousin the job[/quote] He got the job all by himself. You know that process where you apply for a job, get an interview, and then they give the position to the most suitable candidate. Glad I could clear that up for you. [/quote] The only interview Fredo's had is with the dole office...... oh, and that interview under Police caution a while back.
Deeko wrote:
and tell the people who got your cousin the job
He got the job all by himself. You know that process where you apply for a job, get an interview, and then they give the position to the most suitable candidate. Glad I could clear that up for you.
The only interview Fredo's had is with the dole office...... oh, and that interview under Police caution a while back.
Posted by: Darren Wood, Glasgow on 4:57pm Wed 3 Sep 08
Fair enough its a good thing for the folk getting the apprenticeships but hasnt this been announced umpteen times already.
Surely the ET could do better than being a propoganda rag for Glasgow labour party.
Fair enough its a good thing for the folk getting the apprenticeships but hasnt this been announced umpteen times already.
Surely the ET could do better than being a propoganda rag for Glasgow labour party.
Posted by: Frank, Glasgow on 5:46pm Wed 3 Sep 08
Mr Purcell's further booming project........didn'
t we have a booming financial sector thanks to him. And now its all gone belly up not a word of a replacement?!?! Ok I never believed Glasgow labour had anything to do with companies coming to the city but they certainly suggested they did have, Mr purcell's face constantly in this rag. Now they all go one by one and not a word? Should be full of praise for this but it difficult that only time this mob are about is when something good is occurring.
Mr Purcell's further booming project........didn'
t we have a booming financial sector thanks to him. And now its all gone belly up not a word of a replacement?!?! Ok I never believed Glasgow labour had anything to do with companies coming to the city but they certainly suggested they did have, Mr purcell's face constantly in this rag. Now they all go one by one and not a word? Should be full of praise for this but it difficult that only time this mob are about is when something good is occurring.
Posted by: fredo, paisley on 5:56pm Wed 3 Sep 08
[quote][bold]Hoof Hearted[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]Deeko[/bold] wrote: [quote]and tell the people who got your cousin the job[/quote] He got the job all by himself. You know that process where you apply for a job, get an interview, and then they give the position to the most suitable candidate. Glad I could clear that up for you. [/quote] The only interview Fredo's had is with the dole office...... oh, and that interview under Police caution a while back.[/quote] but they were of my own back not the nepotism kind
Hoof Hearted wrote:
Deeko wrote: and tell the people who got your cousin the job
He got the job all by himself. You know that process where you apply for a job, get an interview, and then they give the position to the most suitable candidate. Glad I could clear that up for you.
The only interview Fredo's had is with the dole office...... oh, and that interview under Police caution a while back.
but they were of my own back not the nepotism kind
Posted by: ex labour voter, glasgow on 4:34pm Thu 4 Sep 08
Hey ET instead of the usual purcell p*sh can we have some news on the investigation into corruption by 11 liebour coonsilors including purrcell?
Thought not. This is not a newspaper its just a labour propaganda b*llsh*t rag .
Hey ET instead of the usual purcell p*sh can we have some news on the investigation into corruption by 11 liebour coonsilors including purrcell?
Thought not. This is not a newspaper its just a labour propaganda b*llsh*t rag .