Posted by: The Missing City, Glasgow on 10:57am Wed 10 Sep 08
Give them people new houses
Like a boat, the place will sink with it being only half completed
New homes certainly won't curb gang activity as seen in other parts of Easterhouse or other parts of Glasgow when new builds replace Inter-War and Post War hellholes.
IF GCC had their way, Glasgow would only be referred to as the tourist spots - everything else comes under the banner of Social Exclusion.
Give them people new houses
Like a boat, the place will sink with it being only half completed
New homes certainly won't curb gang activity as seen in other parts of Easterhouse or other parts of Glasgow when new builds replace Inter-War and Post War hellholes.
IF GCC had their way, Glasgow would only be referred to as the tourist spots - everything else comes under the banner of Social Exclusion.
Posted by: Sydney Meriwether, Glasgow on 11:03am Wed 10 Sep 08
The 2014 Diddy Games will [bold]NOT[/bold] deliver any sustainable, long-term benefits to [bold]ANY[/bold] community in Glasgow, that's a fact widely agreed upon by established sporting events' experts (unless you count already-rich greedy property developers as a community).
--
Sydney Meriwether
[italic]"One of Glasgow's more intelligent residents."[/italic]
The 2014 Diddy Games will
NOT deliver any sustainable, long-term benefits to
ANY community in Glasgow, that's a fact widely agreed upon by established sporting events' experts (unless you count already-rich greedy property developers as a community).
--
Sydney Meriwether
"One of Glasgow's more intelligent residents." Posted by: The Missing City, Glasgow on 11:08am Wed 10 Sep 08
[quote][bold]Sydney Meriwether[/bold] wrote:
The 2014 Diddy Games will [bold]NOT[/bold] deliver any sustainable, long-term benefits to [bold]ANY[/bold] community in Glasgow, that's a fact widely agreed upon by established sporting events' experts (unless you count already-rich greedy property developers as a community). -- Sydney Meriwether [italic]"One of Glasgow's more intelligent residents."[/italic] [/quote] I have to agree with you Sydney
Ordinary people will not be affected by these games.
Maybe good for Glasgow to a certain extent, however, it will apply only to business and a small minority of people, especially those who get to own property in the area after the games.
For the rest of the city - it will be business as usual after 2014
Sydney Meriwether wrote:
The 2014 Diddy Games will NOT deliver any sustainable, long-term benefits to ANY community in Glasgow, that's a fact widely agreed upon by established sporting events' experts (unless you count already-rich greedy property developers as a community). -- Sydney Meriwether "One of Glasgow's more intelligent residents."
I have to agree with you Sydney
Ordinary people will not be affected by these games.
Maybe good for Glasgow to a certain extent, however, it will apply only to business and a small minority of people, especially those who get to own property in the area after the games.
For the rest of the city - it will be business as usual after 2014
Posted by: SPAMALOT, southside on 11:09am Wed 10 Sep 08
Whats more important!!!! It also suggests other projects - including the Commonwealth Games Village and the M74 extension - are more deserving, and private housebuilders should step in to bridge gaps HOW!! When people have to live in squalor use the tax payers money to build nice new houses for the games and fancy roads feck of
Whats more important!!!! It also suggests other projects - including the Commonwealth Games Village and the M74 extension - are more deserving, and private housebuilders should step in to bridge gaps HOW!! When people have to live in squalor use the tax payers money to build nice new houses for the games and fancy roads feck of
Posted by: Smeeagain, Lanarkshire on 12:09pm Wed 10 Sep 08
This position was, unfortunately, almost inevitable once control of the management of Housing Association Grant was passed to the Council from Scottish Homes. Local subjective politics has now overtaken the importance of objective strategic investment in affordable housing. Councillors are incapable of seeing beyond their own 'local' priorities to drive forward the provision of affordable rented housing and that new level of political influence is distorting investment priorities.
Glasgow CC has to move away from the misconception that the private sector will solve all the housing problems faced by the city - just look at the Harbour project and take note of the numbers of 'to let' signs and now, the ever more desperate attempts to attract buyers. That is without even beginning to question the wisdom - sense? - of building so many units with little or no provision of social, commercial or health facilities.
Sorry, Glasgow, but the loonies have taken over the asylum.
The people in power - cooncillors and senior officers - can only see one housing association in the city and are out to alienate many of the long established associations who have done fantastic work over the last thirty /forty years - jealousy because the council couldn't compete is probably part of the answer but the greatest irk for councillors was the loss of power from the housing vote - "we have kept your rents down for you"- and the contrast with developing associations.
Don't blame GHA - they don't control allocation of funding after all. Don't forget either that those former tenants who bought under RTB will also face difficulties due to lack of grant funding in the new order of priorities - Housing Associations across the city face real problems when owners are unable to participate in improvement schemes and that means tenants don't get the benefit either!
Politics! Ha!
This position was, unfortunately, almost inevitable once control of the management of Housing Association Grant was passed to the Council from Scottish Homes. Local subjective politics has now overtaken the importance of objective strategic investment in affordable housing. Councillors are incapable of seeing beyond their own 'local' priorities to drive forward the provision of affordable rented housing and that new level of political influence is distorting investment priorities.
Glasgow CC has to move away from the misconception that the private sector will solve all the housing problems faced by the city - just look at the Harbour project and take note of the numbers of 'to let' signs and now, the ever more desperate attempts to attract buyers. That is without even beginning to question the wisdom - sense? - of building so many units with little or no provision of social, commercial or health facilities.
Sorry, Glasgow, but the loonies have taken over the asylum.
The people in power - cooncillors and senior officers - can only see one housing association in the city and are out to alienate many of the long established associations who have done fantastic work over the last thirty /forty years - jealousy because the council couldn't compete is probably part of the answer but the greatest irk for councillors was the loss of power from the housing vote - "we have kept your rents down for you"- and the contrast with developing associations.
Don't blame GHA - they don't control allocation of funding after all. Don't forget either that those former tenants who bought under RTB will also face difficulties due to lack of grant funding in the new order of priorities - Housing Associations across the city face real problems when owners are unable to participate in improvement schemes and that means tenants don't get the benefit either!
Politics! Ha!
Posted by: emceehammer, west midlands on 1:20pm Wed 10 Sep 08
This area of Easterhouse should be bulldozed now and an extension to Barlinnie should be built in it's place to house the scum who run around with knives and crack cocaine all night-Alex the Fish and his Socialist Nepotist Party(SNP) will easily raise the money by fleecing the taxpayers again!!
Commonwealth Games-your having a laugh-nobody is the remotest bit interested in competing against banana republics these days-Why don't we ask the Maxwell family to finance it again?
This area of Easterhouse should be bulldozed now and an extension to Barlinnie should be built in it's place to house the scum who run around with knives and crack cocaine all night-Alex the Fish and his Socialist Nepotist Party(SNP) will easily raise the money by fleecing the taxpayers again!!
Commonwealth Games-your having a laugh-nobody is the remotest bit interested in competing against banana republics these days-Why don't we ask the Maxwell family to finance it again?
Posted by: raypaterson, Glasgow on 1:34pm Wed 10 Sep 08
You have to wonder why the McEnroe family (featured) continued to have so many children if they are unhappy with their living conditions.
You have to wonder why the McEnroe family (featured) continued to have so many children if they are unhappy with their living conditions.
Posted by: leesome, Glasgow on 2:45pm Wed 10 Sep 08
[quote][bold]raypaterson[/bold] wrote:
You have to wonder why the McEnroe family (featured) continued to have so many children if they are unhappy with their living conditions.[/quote] Well done that man and woman, mare weans, mare Schools, mare teachers, etc. Two genuine local heros.
raypaterson wrote:
You have to wonder why the McEnroe family (featured) continued to have so many children if they are unhappy with their living conditions.
Well done that man and woman, mare weans, mare Schools, mare teachers, etc. Two genuine local heros.
Posted by: emma, Glasgow on 1:02am Thu 11 Sep 08
It's not just Easterhouse, it's city wide. Numbers from the GHA rag "the key", 12 Riverford Road/21 Riverbank Street demolished- originally housed 500 homes, future plans for 900 homes of which 80, yes 80!! will be for GHA tenants. So GCC and GHA where have the rest to go? and what for future tenants who don't want to rent off a private landlord?
It's not just Easterhouse, it's city wide. Numbers from the GHA rag "the key", 12 Riverford Road/21 Riverbank Street demolished- originally housed 500 homes, future plans for 900 homes of which 80, yes 80!! will be for GHA tenants. So GCC and GHA where have the rest to go? and what for future tenants who don't want to rent off a private landlord?
Posted by: celtic4, United States on 1:28am Thu 11 Sep 08
Hey, I know I am on the wrong thread, but since no one was allowed to comment on the one, I want to say that bookie shops are very very illegal in this country. Don't know why they are allowed to be on the street in Scotland with an open shop like any other.
Hey, I know I am on the wrong thread, but since no one was allowed to comment on the one, I want to say that bookie shops are very very illegal in this country. Don't know why they are allowed to be on the street in Scotland with an open shop like any other.
Posted by: SPAMALOT, southside on 10:34am Thu 11 Sep 08
YOUR A NUTTER THANK FECK YOUR IN THE YOU ES OF AND DONT COME BACK YOUR NOT WELCOME AWAY AND PUT RANGERS ON TO WIN THE LEAGUE
YOUR A NUTTER THANK FECK YOUR IN THE YOU ES OF AND DONT COME BACK YOUR NOT WELCOME AWAY AND PUT RANGERS ON TO WIN THE LEAGUE
Posted by: trench, possilpark on 2:23pm Thu 11 Sep 08
mr paterson , mr mcenroe works on a production line, did you not read?..haha
mr paterson , mr mcenroe works on a production line, did you not read?..haha
Posted by: annie, Glasgow on 10:32pm Thu 11 Sep 08
Well, where does one start with this one?..it was obvious that many housing associations in the city would rue the day capital funding was transferred to the City Council in return for the Council's support for the transfer of all of its housing stock to GHA. I do not blame individual Councillors because they will admit that they have hardly any say in what happens as all of the power, in the city, regarding housing investment is now wielded by a few senior council officials. As for GHA, the organisation seems to be paralysed and unable to make a decision on anything for at least several years...they have their priorities and it matters not a jot that other worthy opportunities arise in the meantime. The Housing Regulator seems unable to tackle GHA in any meaningful way, and in the meantime GHA is merrily creating a new blandness in the city. Spot the GHA house? No problem because they all look the same. At least other housing associations attempt to create communities and try to design houses people are proud to live in. Give the money to the Easterhouse housing asociations and let them finish the job or repeat the mistakes of the 60s and 70s by spreading cash thinly around the city? It is a no brainer.
Well, where does one start with this one?..it was obvious that many housing associations in the city would rue the day capital funding was transferred to the City Council in return for the Council's support for the transfer of all of its housing stock to GHA. I do not blame individual Councillors because they will admit that they have hardly any say in what happens as all of the power, in the city, regarding housing investment is now wielded by a few senior council officials. As for GHA, the organisation seems to be paralysed and unable to make a decision on anything for at least several years...they have their priorities and it matters not a jot that other worthy opportunities arise in the meantime. The Housing Regulator seems unable to tackle GHA in any meaningful way, and in the meantime GHA is merrily creating a new blandness in the city. Spot the GHA house? No problem because they all look the same. At least other housing associations attempt to create communities and try to design houses people are proud to live in. Give the money to the Easterhouse housing asociations and let them finish the job or repeat the mistakes of the 60s and 70s by spreading cash thinly around the city? It is a no brainer.