Posted by: KB, Glasgow on 11:10am Tue 21 Oct 08
[bold][italic]"It's bigger, brighter than before and the new pub is very nice."[/italic][/bold]
Says it all....welcome to Glasgow.
"It's bigger, brighter than before and the new pub is very nice."
Says it all....welcome to Glasgow.
Posted by: Brad on 11:16am Tue 21 Oct 08
Well, shouldn't be too churlish about any improvement. Bit of tarting up for the sale...
Well, shouldn't be too churlish about any improvement. Bit of tarting up for the sale...
Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 11:33am Tue 21 Oct 08
roll on the sale
Posted by: Harry, Glasgow on 12:03pm Tue 21 Oct 08
so the first passenger got a bottle of champagne... if it was more than a miniature the security folk probably confiscated it.
so the first passenger got a bottle of champagne... if it was more than a miniature the security folk probably confiscated it.
Posted by: steven976, Feltham, Middx on 12:03pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]jim[/bold] wrote:
roll on the sale [/quote] Not really, Jim... the shareholders, and the owners (Spanish-based FERROVIAL) will be the only ones to benefit from any sale. You can bet when it is sold, the ground rent for the reatil units will increase, landing charges wil rise, ground-handling costs will increase, and somebody has to pay for all of this... YOU, ME, and EVERY OTHER MUG!!
jim wrote:
roll on the sale
Not really, Jim... the shareholders, and the owners (Spanish-based FERROVIAL) will be the only ones to benefit from any sale. You can bet when it is sold, the ground rent for the reatil units will increase, landing charges wil rise, ground-handling costs will increase, and somebody has to pay for all of this... YOU, ME, and EVERY OTHER MUG!!
Posted by: lundw01, Swindon on 12:42pm Tue 21 Oct 08
So we will have a brand new spanking security area to queue in!
So we will have a brand new spanking security area to queue in!
Posted by: steven976, Feltham, Middx on 12:48pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]lundw01[/bold] wrote:
So we will have a brand new spanking security area to queue in![/quote] I thought you just got searched, and your bags x-rayed in the security area.. I'm all for making flying a pleasurable experience for passengers, but I draw the line at masochism!!
lundw01 wrote:
So we will have a brand new spanking security area to queue in!
I thought you just got searched, and your bags x-rayed in the security area.. I'm all for making flying a pleasurable experience for passengers, but I draw the line at masochism!!
Posted by: doug, glasgow on 12:55pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]lundw01[/bold] wrote:
So we will have a brand new spanking security area to queue in![/quote] there wouldnt be queue's is our fellow passenger do what they are ment to do when they go thru security.
I travel a fair few times a year and its always the same some muppet standing saying "I thought I could take my 1L bottle of idiot juice"
lundw01 wrote:
So we will have a brand new spanking security area to queue in!
there wouldnt be queue's is our fellow passenger do what they are ment to do when they go thru security.
I travel a fair few times a year and its always the same some muppet standing saying "I thought I could take my 1L bottle of idiot juice"
Posted by: doug, glasgow on 12:58pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]jim[/bold] wrote:
roll on the sale [/quote] Yeah so the airport gets sold off no money is spent on it, security is out sourced to reliance prob(and we have seen what a good job they do at £6 per hour) and the place becomes a feeder airport for amsterdam or manchester yeah great.
any way why does every one think glasgow could be sold edinburgh is not geting a train station and they have diched plans to buy the show ground? what does that say
jim wrote:
roll on the sale
Yeah so the airport gets sold off no money is spent on it, security is out sourced to reliance prob(and we have seen what a good job they do at £6 per hour) and the place becomes a feeder airport for amsterdam or manchester yeah great.
any way why does every one think glasgow could be sold edinburgh is not geting a train station and they have diched plans to buy the show ground? what does that say
Posted by: Stewie Griffin, Glasgow on 1:08pm Tue 21 Oct 08
No point extending it if you can't fly from it. If you want a flight at a decent hour to a popular destination, Glasgow Airport isn't the place to fly from.
No point extending it if you can't fly from it. If you want a flight at a decent hour to a popular destination, Glasgow Airport isn't the place to fly from.
Posted by: steven976, Feltham, Middx on 2:09pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]Stewie Griffin[/bold] wrote:
No point extending it if you can't fly from it. If you want a flight at a decent hour to a popular destination, Glasgow Airport isn't the place to fly from. [/quote] That's because Glasgow International is a "holiday" airport, i.e. charters to spain, etc. Perhaps if the airport management team were to liaise with the local Chambers of commerce in the West of Scotland to establish exactly who and what goes where, then they could make the airport more attractive from a business perspective. This might mean a swing away from charter traffic to freight, or even business travel, similar to that of Heathrow (but on a lesser scale, obviously). But seeing as Glasgow has become one large call centre, there is little outbound or inbound traffic available, so it's back to square one, I'm afraid!!
Stewie Griffin wrote:
No point extending it if you can't fly from it. If you want a flight at a decent hour to a popular destination, Glasgow Airport isn't the place to fly from.
That's because Glasgow International is a "holiday" airport, i.e. charters to spain, etc. Perhaps if the airport management team were to liaise with the local Chambers of commerce in the West of Scotland to establish exactly who and what goes where, then they could make the airport more attractive from a business perspective. This might mean a swing away from charter traffic to freight, or even business travel, similar to that of Heathrow (but on a lesser scale, obviously). But seeing as Glasgow has become one large call centre, there is little outbound or inbound traffic available, so it's back to square one, I'm afraid!!
Posted by: D.W., Glasgow on 2:38pm Tue 21 Oct 08
To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive.
However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines.
Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even [italic]slightly[/italic] interested in running a competitive airport.
To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive.
However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines.
Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even
slightly interested in running a competitive airport.
Posted by: steven976, Feltham, Middx on 2:52pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]D.W.[/bold] wrote:
To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive. However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines. Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even [italic]slightly[/italic] interested in running a competitive airport.[/quote] Point taken re the call centre remark, but I used to work for TNT Skypak (now TNT Express Worldwide) at Edinburgh airport. At that time, they had a daily flight from their (then) Cologne (CGN) hub via Birmingham, to Prestwick. The volume of freight received for SCOTLAND was broken down thus: Glasgow area: typically a transit-sized van, usually only half-full / Aberdeen: generally small parts for the oil industry, sent on the overnight trunk from their Bellshill depot / Edinburgh area: at least 1 LWB high-top Merc Sprinter (sub-contracted to TUMAX of Ayrshire). Reason why EDI got the bulk of the freight?.. Hi-tech companies in Livingston, Haddington (the old Mitsubishi factory), Dunfermline, Glenrothes, Falkirk, Grangemouth, Dundee, etc.. When Glasgow and the West of Scotland can attact similar levels of manufacturing industry, then you will see a swing away from "holiday" traffic.. Not before!!
D.W. wrote:
To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive. However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines. Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even slightly interested in running a competitive airport.
Point taken re the call centre remark, but I used to work for TNT Skypak (now TNT Express Worldwide) at Edinburgh airport. At that time, they had a daily flight from their (then) Cologne (CGN) hub via Birmingham, to Prestwick. The volume of freight received for SCOTLAND was broken down thus: Glasgow area: typically a transit-sized van, usually only half-full / Aberdeen: generally small parts for the oil industry, sent on the overnight trunk from their Bellshill depot / Edinburgh area: at least 1 LWB high-top Merc Sprinter (sub-contracted to TUMAX of Ayrshire). Reason why EDI got the bulk of the freight?.. Hi-tech companies in Livingston, Haddington (the old Mitsubishi factory), Dunfermline, Glenrothes, Falkirk, Grangemouth, Dundee, etc.. When Glasgow and the West of Scotland can attact similar levels of manufacturing industry, then you will see a swing away from "holiday" traffic.. Not before!!
Posted by: D.W., Glasgow on 3:18pm Tue 21 Oct 08
I've got no reason to dispute the details of what you say, but I would argue that Glasgow and the West of Scotland has traditionally been the hub of the country's heavy manufacturing industry. The hi-tech companies were established more evenly, with the New Towns getting a decent slice of the pie.
On a related note, I'm led to believe that the only thing booming these days at Glasgow Airport is the freight handling business.
I've got no reason to dispute the details of what you say, but I would argue that Glasgow and the West of Scotland has traditionally been the hub of the country's heavy manufacturing industry. The hi-tech companies were established more evenly, with the New Towns getting a decent slice of the pie.
On a related note, I'm led to believe that the only thing booming these days at Glasgow Airport is the freight handling business.
Posted by: steven976, Feltham, Middx on 3:41pm Tue 21 Oct 08
DEEDUB - that's Glasgow's problem these days.. NO HEAVY INDUSTRY LEFT!!
DEEDUB - that's Glasgow's problem these days.. NO HEAVY INDUSTRY LEFT!!
Posted by: The Missing City, Glasgow on 4:09pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]steven976[/bold] wrote:
DEEDUB - that's Glasgow's problem these days.. NO HEAVY INDUSTRY LEFT!![/quote] Yip, in its place we have Heavy Smack!
Jokes aside, well done to Glasgow Airport - a significant indicator that the airport is continuing to succeed.
With the addition of T2 and the GARL in a couple of years, more traffic will only mean further success.
having read the City Council's recent Economic Review, there is the need for the Crossrail development which (as featured in the report) will connect even more people with the airport, just like the way it is in other major countries with major airports.
Why should Glasgow be any different in that respect?
steven976 wrote:
DEEDUB - that's Glasgow's problem these days.. NO HEAVY INDUSTRY LEFT!!
Yip, in its place we have Heavy Smack!
Jokes aside, well done to Glasgow Airport - a significant indicator that the airport is continuing to succeed.
With the addition of T2 and the GARL in a couple of years, more traffic will only mean further success.
having read the City Council's recent Economic Review, there is the need for the Crossrail development which (as featured in the report) will connect even more people with the airport, just like the way it is in other major countries with major airports.
Why should Glasgow be any different in that respect?
Posted by: Ian on 4:23pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]steven976[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]D.W.[/bold] wrote: To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive. However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines. Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even [italic]slightly[/italic] interested in running a competitive airport.[/quote] Point taken re the call centre remark, but I used to work for TNT Skypak (now TNT Express Worldwide) at Edinburgh airport. At that time, they had a daily flight from their (then) Cologne (CGN) hub via Birmingham, to Prestwick. The volume of freight received for SCOTLAND was broken down thus: Glasgow area: typically a transit-sized van, usually only half-full / Aberdeen: generally small parts for the oil industry, sent on the overnight trunk from their Bellshill depot / Edinburgh area: at least 1 LWB high-top Merc Sprinter (sub-contracted to TUMAX of Ayrshire). Reason why EDI got the bulk of the freight?.. Hi-tech companies in Livingston, Haddington (the old Mitsubishi factory), Dunfermline, Glenrothes, Falkirk, Grangemouth, Dundee, etc.. When Glasgow and the West of Scotland can attact similar levels of manufacturing industry, then you will see a swing away from "holiday" traffic.. Not before!! [/quote] I've no reason to doubt your big full van heading to Edinburgh. However, it is all relevant to how the specific manufacturing company chooses to source their materials from. One thing you are mistaken about is the fact that there are more manu jobs in the east of the country - entirely untrue, Glasgow and the West hold far and away the most manu jobs in the country, even with the heavy industry decline.
steven976 wrote:
D.W. wrote: To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive. However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines. Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even slightly interested in running a competitive airport.
Point taken re the call centre remark, but I used to work for TNT Skypak (now TNT Express Worldwide) at Edinburgh airport. At that time, they had a daily flight from their (then) Cologne (CGN) hub via Birmingham, to Prestwick. The volume of freight received for SCOTLAND was broken down thus: Glasgow area: typically a transit-sized van, usually only half-full / Aberdeen: generally small parts for the oil industry, sent on the overnight trunk from their Bellshill depot / Edinburgh area: at least 1 LWB high-top Merc Sprinter (sub-contracted to TUMAX of Ayrshire). Reason why EDI got the bulk of the freight?.. Hi-tech companies in Livingston, Haddington (the old Mitsubishi factory), Dunfermline, Glenrothes, Falkirk, Grangemouth, Dundee, etc.. When Glasgow and the West of Scotland can attact similar levels of manufacturing industry, then you will see a swing away from "holiday" traffic.. Not before!!
I've no reason to doubt your big full van heading to Edinburgh. However, it is all relevant to how the specific manufacturing company chooses to source their materials from. One thing you are mistaken about is the fact that there are more manu jobs in the east of the country - entirely untrue, Glasgow and the West hold far and away the most manu jobs in the country, even with the heavy industry decline.
Posted by: steven976, Feltham, Middx on 4:48pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]Ian[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]steven976[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]D.W.[/bold] wrote: To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive. However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines. Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even [italic]slightly[/italic] interested in running a competitive airport.[/quote] Point taken re the call centre remark, but I used to work for TNT Skypak (now TNT Express Worldwide) at Edinburgh airport. At that time, they had a daily flight from their (then) Cologne (CGN) hub via Birmingham, to Prestwick. The volume of freight received for SCOTLAND was broken down thus: Glasgow area: typically a transit-sized van, usually only half-full / Aberdeen: generally small parts for the oil industry, sent on the overnight trunk from their Bellshill depot / Edinburgh area: at least 1 LWB high-top Merc Sprinter (sub-contracted to TUMAX of Ayrshire). Reason why EDI got the bulk of the freight?.. Hi-tech companies in Livingston, Haddington (the old Mitsubishi factory), Dunfermline, Glenrothes, Falkirk, Grangemouth, Dundee, etc.. When Glasgow and the West of Scotland can attact similar levels of manufacturing industry, then you will see a swing away from "holiday" traffic.. Not before!! [/quote] I've no reason to doubt your big full van heading to Edinburgh. However, it is all relevant to how the specific manufacturing company chooses to source their materials from. One thing you are mistaken about is the fact that there are more manu jobs in the east of the country - entirely untrue, Glasgow and the West hold far and away the most manu jobs in the country, even with the heavy industry decline.[/quote] Maybe the west does have more manuf jobs, but what is their market? Local?? Scotland-wide?.. UK based?? European?? Or Worldwide?? Therein lies your answer!!
Ian wrote:
steven976 wrote: D.W. wrote: To call Glasgow "one large call centre" is something of a pessimistic exaggeration. There is sufficient business traffic to and from this city to ensure that a properly managed local airport would thrive. However, BAA aren't interested in making Glasgow airport more attractive from a business perspective, or any other perspective. Several years ago they decided to prioritise Edinburgh as their hub, and set landing charges at both airports accordingly to ensure Edinburgh would be substantially more attractive to airlines. Despite the Skyhub investment, Glasgow will continue to play the poor relation until BAA is forced to sell one of the two airports. With almost all of their eggs in the Edinburgh basket, it will be Glasgow that goes - and that will be no bad thing if the new owner is even slightly interested in running a competitive airport.
Point taken re the call centre remark, but I used to work for TNT Skypak (now TNT Express Worldwide) at Edinburgh airport. At that time, they had a daily flight from their (then) Cologne (CGN) hub via Birmingham, to Prestwick. The volume of freight received for SCOTLAND was broken down thus: Glasgow area: typically a transit-sized van, usually only half-full / Aberdeen: generally small parts for the oil industry, sent on the overnight trunk from their Bellshill depot / Edinburgh area: at least 1 LWB high-top Merc Sprinter (sub-contracted to TUMAX of Ayrshire). Reason why EDI got the bulk of the freight?.. Hi-tech companies in Livingston, Haddington (the old Mitsubishi factory), Dunfermline, Glenrothes, Falkirk, Grangemouth, Dundee, etc.. When Glasgow and the West of Scotland can attact similar levels of manufacturing industry, then you will see a swing away from "holiday" traffic.. Not before!!
I've no reason to doubt your big full van heading to Edinburgh. However, it is all relevant to how the specific manufacturing company chooses to source their materials from. One thing you are mistaken about is the fact that there are more manu jobs in the east of the country - entirely untrue, Glasgow and the West hold far and away the most manu jobs in the country, even with the heavy industry decline.
Maybe the west does have more manuf jobs, but what is their market? Local?? Scotland-wide?.. UK based?? European?? Or Worldwide?? Therein lies your answer!!
Posted by: jrb, glasgow on 6:17pm Tue 21 Oct 08
has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..
has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..
Posted by: The Missing City, Glasgow on 6:33pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]jrb[/bold] wrote:
has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..[/quote] Yes it appears to be the case Jaaayaaarbee
Tragic time for us all - no more humour for this evening - shame - it was going well, even replied to your post as well regarding the 25,000 word report with analysis on Syd and Meep.
If you caught it, I hope you didnay pea yerself hee hee
C Ya mate!
jrb wrote:
has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..
Yes it appears to be the case Jaaayaaarbee
Tragic time for us all - no more humour for this evening - shame - it was going well, even replied to your post as well regarding the 25,000 word report with analysis on Syd and Meep.
If you caught it, I hope you didnay pea yerself hee hee
C Ya mate!
Posted by: jrb, glasgow on 7:00pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]The Missing City[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]jrb[/bold] wrote: has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..[/quote] Yes it appears to be the case Jaaayaaarbee Tragic time for us all - no more humour for this evening - shame - it was going well, even replied to your post as well regarding the 25,000 word report with analysis on Syd and Meep. If you caught it, I hope you didnay pea yerself hee hee C Ya mate! [/quote] No I'm afraid I missed it,I Didn't think there was any content of the posting which could have caused offence on this particular issue,perhaps Sam the online editor could enlighten us!..
The Missing City wrote:
jrb wrote: has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..
Yes it appears to be the case Jaaayaaarbee Tragic time for us all - no more humour for this evening - shame - it was going well, even replied to your post as well regarding the 25,000 word report with analysis on Syd and Meep. If you caught it, I hope you didnay pea yerself hee hee C Ya mate!
No I'm afraid I missed it,I Didn't think there was any content of the posting which could have caused offence on this particular issue,perhaps Sam the online editor could enlighten us!..
Posted by: The Missing City, Glasgow on 7:09pm Tue 21 Oct 08
[quote][bold]jrb[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]The Missing City[/bold] wrote: [quote][bold]jrb[/bold] wrote: has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..[/quote] Yes it appears to be the case Jaaayaaarbee Tragic time for us all - no more humour for this evening - shame - it was going well, even replied to your post as well regarding the 25,000 word report with analysis on Syd and Meep. If you caught it, I hope you didnay pea yerself hee hee C Ya mate! [/quote] No I'm afraid I missed it,I Didn't think there was any content of the posting which could have caused offence on this particular issue,perhaps Sam the online editor could enlighten us!..[/quote] I think he might have been taking his period!
jrb wrote:
The Missing City wrote: jrb wrote: has the posts been pulled on the glasgow shops story??..
Yes it appears to be the case Jaaayaaarbee Tragic time for us all - no more humour for this evening - shame - it was going well, even replied to your post as well regarding the 25,000 word report with analysis on Syd and Meep. If you caught it, I hope you didnay pea yerself hee hee C Ya mate!
No I'm afraid I missed it,I Didn't think there was any content of the posting which could have caused offence on this particular issue,perhaps Sam the online editor could enlighten us!..
I think he might have been taking his period!
Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 11:16am Wed 22 Oct 08
[quote][bold]steven976[/bold] wrote:
[quote][bold]jim[/bold] wrote: roll on the sale [/quote] Not really, Jim... the shareholders, and the owners (Spanish-based FERROVIAL) will be the only ones to benefit from any sale. You can bet when it is sold, the ground rent for the reatil units will increase, landing charges wil rise, ground-handling costs will increase, and somebody has to pay for all of this... YOU, ME, and EVERY OTHER MUG!![/quote] bring it on dont be scared of change.thats what hold britain oops sorry england back.
steven976 wrote:
jim wrote: roll on the sale
Not really, Jim... the shareholders, and the owners (Spanish-based FERROVIAL) will be the only ones to benefit from any sale. You can bet when it is sold, the ground rent for the reatil units will increase, landing charges wil rise, ground-handling costs will increase, and somebody has to pay for all of this... YOU, ME, and EVERY OTHER MUG!!
bring it on dont be scared of change.thats what hold britain oops sorry england back.
Posted by: jim, Glasgow on 11:19am Wed 22 Oct 08
call centre remark ,green eyed monsta me thinks,Glasgow pulls more conferences than any other city in scotland for biz,fact,
call centre remark ,green eyed monsta me thinks,Glasgow pulls more conferences than any other city in scotland for biz,fact,