Scots deserve a better quality of political debate

POLITICS can be a frustrating business, both for voters who are trying to make sense of the arguments and for politicians ourselves, trying to get policies across in a constructive and engaging way.

Loading Comments

When we're at our best, politicians can put forward new ideas, test the arguments, hold power to account, and find shared ground where we can co-operate despite our differences.

When we're at our worst, we just bark at one another and let opportunities for progress pass us by.

Sadly the latter way of working is the default position. Over the last month we've seen both. One extraordinary week saw cross-party agreement, and an atmosphere of pride in what we can do when we work together.

A free vote to legalise same-sex marriage saw a huge majority for equality.

But it wasn't just the way MSPs voted which made an impact, it was also the tone of the debate and the respect shown between the politicians and the campaigners.

The very next day, after months of haggling over the budget, Labour and the SNP buried their differences and struck a deal to effectively neutralise the Bedroom Tax.

IT'S not always easy to reach compromise between political opponents, and these two parties are often tribally hostile to one another.

That week showed what was possible when goodwill breaks out.

More recently we've seen the opposite.

The Criminal Justice debate last week saw ugly scenes in the Chamber, as MSPs split over the abolition of the 'corroboration' rule that requires multiple sources of evidence in Scots courts.

Instead of Ministers proposing a clear alternative so that MSPs can judge whether it's an improvement and build a consensus on the right thing to do, the debate descended into a 'stairheid rammy'.

Of all the political issues we face, it's the independence debate where this hostility can be most damaging.

People still making their minds up won't have much chance if they just hear politicians shouting at one another.

Even less appealing is the influence of big business, with banks threatening to leave Scotland if we vote Yes, and airlines demanding even deeper tax breaks than they already enjoy.

We can't let the debate on Scotland's future be reduced to a choice between caving in to one bunch of multinationals or another.

A BETTER debate is possible, on both sides. The debate on independence deserves to be passionate, creative and inspiring.

But it will only achieve that if both sides are willing to listen, think, and set out a positive vision, instead of mindlessly shouting at one another.

Whatever the referendum result, we'll be in a stronger position to go forward if we've let our highest standards lead us, instead of our lowest.

Local government

Commenting & Moderation

We moderate all comments on Evening Times on either a pre-moderated or post-moderated basis. If you're a relatively new user then your comments will be reviewed before publication and if we know you well and trust you then your comments will be subject to moderation only if other users or the moderators believe you've broken the rules

Moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours. Please be patient if your posts are not approved instantly.


Have you got a story?

Contact the news desk on 0141 302 6520 or email
A weekly round up of social highlights

A weekly round up of social highlights

Cat's Eyes on Glasgow

Chilling in Glasgow's first Ice Bar and getting Mhor than I bargained for




Michelle McManus

Michelle McManus

Columnist Michelle McManus is Sussed in the City, and loves to chat about anything and everything.

Games news:

Putting the world to rights

Gail's Gab

My thoughts after Police Scotland are ordered to apologise over IRA interrogation techniques slur.

Janice Bell

Janice Bell

You couldn’t make up half the stuff that happens to PA Janice Bell- some of the jams she gets herself into are worth a story or two.