A 30-YEAR-OLD woman who lives in Castlemilk, Glasgow, with her mother, partner and baby daughter told us of her use of a food bank.
She said: “My partner lost his job in 2014, and my hours were cut back. But, because I was working 20 hours a week, he couldn’t claim benefits. And it was only minimum wage at the time. If it wasn’t for the food bank we would have had to turn to payday loans.
“We had spoken to the adviser that works in the housing association to see if there was any benefits my partner could get, or anything we could do. That’s when we were advised the only thing we could do is use the food bank.
“So I went down to the Law Centre with my partner. We filled in all the paperwork for it and they gave us tokens. I thought it was mainly for people who were struggling and it’s one of these things where you know of it, you hear about it, but it doesn’t really affect you.
“It’s not one of these things you would ever think you would have to use.
“I think it really, really badly affected me at the time psychologically and emotionally.
“We chose a food bank that was slightly further away, [because] no-one knew you there. I wasn’t quite ready to let anyone know that we had to use a food bank. I felt awful because I kept thinking there are people out there a lot worse off ... that need this more than me.
“I’m lucky because I do a lot of cooking. The only thing that I could think of from a kind of dietary point of view, they didn’t provide much protein.
It was mostly rices and pastas, which I suppose is great.
“The volunteers were a little bit more understanding when I burst out crying the first time I went in. They made sure I was okay.
“I have become more aware of the need for food banks. So we quite often donate now.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here