Willie Rennie
THE birth of the Scottish Parliament was far from problem free but the contrast with Brexit is striking.
The Scottish Parliament was born after a long period of considered debate and discussion across civic and political Scotland.
The Constitutional Convention developed a detailed plan created by the politicians from across the spectrum, the unions, the churches and wider society.
That plan was consented through multiple manifesto commitments and also by the referendum based on a White Paper which had already been the subject of parliamentary scrutiny. Donald Tusk’s special words for the architects of Brexit who didn’t have a sketch of a plan find no parallels here.
No government should ever put forward a proposition in a referendum that it does not want to happen, especially if there is no plan on how to deliver it.
Those sunny days 20 years ago were exhausting yet exhilarating. Forging something new and fresh was an honour.
I was a young party campaigner who had returned to Scotland after a few years in the West Country to take up the position of Chief Executive to run the first Scottish Parliamentary Elections.
There was a new challenge with contesting the elections under proportional representation. Reaching out to every voter in every part of Scotland with a message of hope and opportunity to fully utilise the new powers in Edinburgh meant a bigger and more expansive campaigning machine.
Jim Wallace and Donald Gorrie had opted to transfer from Westminster to Edinburgh and Nicol Stephen had served in the House of Commons for a period but the rest of the group were new to parliamentary office. Yet they were immediately plunged into coalition discussions with the Labour Party.
There had been some pre-election chats but no plan which made the following week frenetic. Late night discussions between the parties and with members. It worked because we were serious and committed to make the first years of Parliament work and to cease the opportunity to prove we were a party of government that could deliver change for the better.
We had to learn about government and fast. The Labour Party had to learn about partnership. They arrived with little more than a sheet of paper which invited us to join their government! We arrived with a fully worked out programme for government. Of course there were compromises, as there should be with any good partnership, but there is little doubt that we won the case for a detailed programme for a joint government, not a just a few Liberal Democrats in a Labour Government.
However, the real reason for success of that first government was the foundations built on a personal, trusted relationship between Jim Wallace and Donald Dewar. They were principled but also pragmatic and reasonable people who want to change the country for the better.
The second striking contrast with today was how the constitutional debate brought the country together. The Parliament was a force for unity and shared endeavour. It is such a disappointment to so many that the good will of 20 years has been squandered by the forces for division on extreme of the Brexit and Independence debates. Yet there is hope. I can sense the desire from the public that the politicians should put the constitutional divisions behind us and unite for a better country.
Willie Rennie is leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel